2020 Election Results Controversy
- Thread starter georgemarsh
- Start date
- Status
10 Crazy Examples of Unrelated Waste and Partisan Kick-Backs in New ‘COVID’ Bill
Any time you concentrate massive spending power in the hands of a relatively small number of people with little oversight from the public, corruption is almost certain to ensue.
fee.org
ROGER SIMON: Lies the Supreme Court Told Me.
In a fashion we must now regard as entirely predictable the Supreme Court of the United States has dismissed (i.e., thrown out) the various state challenges to the 2020 presidential election.
Any decisions on these challenges were determined by the majority to be “moot” because the election had already been decided, and Donald Trump has conceded to Joe Biden. (Associate Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch objected in varying degrees.)
In other words, a stolen presidential election—if it happens, we don’t really know in this case—has an almost immediate statute of limitations, although the results of that election can affect hundreds of millions, if not, as in the case of the United States, nearly the entirety of humanity.
This is true, apparently for a majority of the Supremes, although all sorts of crimes, some not particularly onerous, have statutes of limitations that can go on for years.
Go figure.
The Supremes also cited the issue of “standing,” a term of legal “art” that has always struck me, despite all the precedents on which it is supposedly based, as wide open for biased interpretation of the most self-serving sort. One person’s “standing” can be another’s closed door, almost at will and certainly by vote of a “majority.”
www.theepochtimes.com
In a fashion we must now regard as entirely predictable the Supreme Court of the United States has dismissed (i.e., thrown out) the various state challenges to the 2020 presidential election.
Any decisions on these challenges were determined by the majority to be “moot” because the election had already been decided, and Donald Trump has conceded to Joe Biden. (Associate Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch objected in varying degrees.)
In other words, a stolen presidential election—if it happens, we don’t really know in this case—has an almost immediate statute of limitations, although the results of that election can affect hundreds of millions, if not, as in the case of the United States, nearly the entirety of humanity.
This is true, apparently for a majority of the Supremes, although all sorts of crimes, some not particularly onerous, have statutes of limitations that can go on for years.
Go figure.
The Supremes also cited the issue of “standing,” a term of legal “art” that has always struck me, despite all the precedents on which it is supposedly based, as wide open for biased interpretation of the most self-serving sort. One person’s “standing” can be another’s closed door, almost at will and certainly by vote of a “majority.”
Opinion: Lies the Supreme Court Told Me
Commentary In a fashion we must now regard as entirely predictable the Supreme Court of the United States ...
GUTLESS WONDERS: Clarence Thomas Blasts the Supreme Court for Ducking the Pennsylvania Election Challenge.
“Few things are worse for public confidence in elections than having the rules changed in the middle of the game (or after it). An epidemic of late-in-the-day changes to the rules was particularly corrosive in 2020. Courts are ill-equipped to referee those changes when partisan tempers are running hot. The Supreme Court just threw away its last opportunity to remedy that problem before the next election cycle. . . . This issue will not go away, and it may return next time surrounded by the same sorts of popular rage that led to the Capitol riot. This was the time for cooler heads to say what the law is.”
There will be a lot more rage next time, I expect.
www.nationalreview.com
“Few things are worse for public confidence in elections than having the rules changed in the middle of the game (or after it). An epidemic of late-in-the-day changes to the rules was particularly corrosive in 2020. Courts are ill-equipped to referee those changes when partisan tempers are running hot. The Supreme Court just threw away its last opportunity to remedy that problem before the next election cycle. . . . This issue will not go away, and it may return next time surrounded by the same sorts of popular rage that led to the Capitol riot. This was the time for cooler heads to say what the law is.”
There will be a lot more rage next time, I expect.
Clarence Thomas Blasts the Supreme Court for Ducking the Pennsylvania Election Challenge | National Review
The Court should have decided this case now, if not earlier.
www.nationalreview.com
Biden’s HHS Pick Advocates Sex Changes for Kids. - The National Pulse
On Thursday, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee will hold a nomination hearing for Dr. Rachel Levine, President Joe Biden’s pick for Assistant Secretary of Health at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). There are plenty of reasons for the committee to...
thenationalpulse.com
Media Matters Campaign to Deplatform Fox News Off Cable and Satellite Systems Gains Ground With Democrat Hearing in Congress This Week | The Gateway Pundit | by Kristinn Taylor
The campaign by Democrat Party front group Media Matters for America to get Fox News removed from cable TV systems is gaining ground this month with a column by The New York Times’ Nicholas Kristof and a Democrat-led House hearing this Wednesday targeting cable and satellite operators who carry...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Biden’s Equality Act is a danger to women’s and conscience rights
President Biden has promised to unify the nation. But candidate Joe Biden also made campaign promises to the radical wing of his party that would widen our social divides. Guess which promises are …
nypost.com
73% of Trump Voters Say China Joe Biden Was Not Legitimately Elected - 76% Say They Will Vote for Trump Again if He Runs | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
76% of Trump voters say they will support him again if he runs for president in 2024.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
HERE'S A WHOPPER!
www.breitbart.com
Stefanik: Garland 'Not Fit to Be' AG over Cuomo Answer, 'He's Not Reading the Basic News'
On Monday's broadcast of "Fox News Primetime," Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) stated that Attorney General nominee Merrick Garland "is not fit to be the | Clips
www.breitbart.com
Hawley: Biden 'More Focused' on Amnesty than Working Class Job Losses
Josh Hawley says Biden is "more focused" on amnesty to illegals than grappling with potential economic doom for America's working class.
www.breitbart.com
Analysis: Democrat Coronavirus Bill Contains 'At Least $312 Billion' in Policies Unrelated to Pandemic
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget wrote that the Democrats' COVID bill contains at least $312 billion in unrelated policies.
www.breitbart.com
Garland: 'I Don't Know' If DOJ Will Keep Prosecuting Illegal Immigration
Merrick Garland says he does not know if the DOJ will continue prosecuting illegal border crossings should the Senate confirm him.
www.breitbart.com
Report: Biden's HHS Secretary Nominee Eyes Healthcare for Illegal Aliens
Attorney General of California Xavier Becerra is eyeing plans to provide illegal aliens with healthcare benefits, according to a report.
www.breitbart.com
Comfort and Javits Left Mostly Empty During Cuomo Nursing Home Order
The ship remained largely unused while nursing homes accepted COVID-19 positive residents under New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's order.
www.breitbart.com
With Supreme Court’s Non-Decision, Citizens Must Reform Electoral System
Commentary The U.S. Supreme Court’s appalling decision not to hear a Republican challenge to Pennsylvania’s extra-legal changing of ...
China in Focus (Feb. 22): Beijing Pressing Biden to Drop Trump Policies
Beijing is urging President Joe Biden about so-called "red lines" he shouldn’t cross. This comes after Biden’s latest ...
api.parler.com
“Weaponizing the power of banking regulators at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency, the Obama administration realized it could block entire industries from the banking system that it didn’t like. This made it difficult — if not impossible — for politically unfavored businesses such as gun sellers and short-term lenders to operate,” she wrote.
“Essentially, by using the power of federal banking regulators to intimidate banks from providing their services to these industries, the administration choked off their access to the financial system, leaving them paying more for essential banking services, or unable to use a bank at all.”
Biden Admin Sets Stage for Return of Obama's Controversial Operation Choke Point
Intimidating banks into doing the bidding of the administration? The Biden administration appears to be headed in that direction.
www.westernjournal.com
- Status
Similar threads
