With all the light being shined upon the less than exact art of recruiting, it would be interesting if someone had the time and/or inclination to take a look at the major recruiting services. It would be exhaustive no doubt, but just to compare how much each one "got it right" say over the last 10 year stretch. Obviously, the criteria would be subjective but like I said, it would make for some interesting reading.
Recruiting site study
- Thread starter RAZOR2
- Start date
