SIAP LSU

[minnesotahog]

What does this even mean? You realize there is more than one measurement of "economy" and that the economy is a combination of economic indicators and not a stand-alone entity, right?

Here is a pretty good synopsis of the idiocy of Bobby Jindal.
http://www.newsweek.com/how-bobby-jindal-broke-louisiana-economy-337999

I know nothing about the combinations of economic factors. The only people that know stuff like that believe that obamacare was going to lower insurance cost. Or that we have 5% unemployment. Or global warming was supposed to have killed us by now. Or that repubs have obstructed the head guys agenda and that why the world is about to go into another recession (even thought he's gotten everything he wanted.) or that electing Bernie will make everything free and utopia will finally happen. hello grim bottom!!!

And for your grap, post the number of jobs created per quarter during Reagan and Obama? And Reagan inherited a far worse recession than obama.

 

[ermackey]

I know nothing about the combinations of economic factors. The only people that know stuff like that believe that obamacare was going to lower insurance cost. Or that we have 5% unemployment. Or global warming was supposed to have killed us by now. Or that repubs have obstructed the head guys agenda and that why the world is about to go into another recession (even thought he's gotten everything he wanted.) or that electing Bernie will make everything free and utopia will finally happen. hello grim bottom!!!

And for your graph, post the number of jobs created per quarter during Reagan and Obama? And Reagan inherited a far worse recession than obama.

Actually, almost identical

 

[minnesotahog]

Actually, almost identical

I said jobs per quarter, not unemployment rate. Problem with this chart is the current unemployment rate is still at least 10%. You do know the participial employment rate is at the lowest level since Carter right? Which not counted the people that have stopped looking for work is how you get a current 5% unemployment rate.

 

[rzrbk7777]

The beauty of this graph is that it conveys visual information. Please concentrate on the middle bar, for it represents my general feelings toward you and your ramblings.

No it doesn't. That graph id BS. Simple math, when obama took office, the idiot Bush had built up 4 trillion in debt. 7 years into your idiot's term, the debt is 20 trillion. That means he is responsible for 80% of the nation's current debt. Your graph is a lie. BTW, obama has created more debt than ALL other presidents in history combined. Your graph is a lie.

But, what should I expect from a socialist wannabee that is either stupid enough to think printing more money lowers debt or corrupt enough to lie about it. If that were the case, the richest country on earth would be the one with the biggest printing press.

 

[ermackey]

I said jobs per quarter, not unemployment rate. Problem with this chart is the current unemployment rate is still at least 10%. You do know the participial employment rate is at the lowest level since Carter right? Which not counted the people that have stopped looking for work is how you get a current 5% unemployment rate.

Not sure what your point is. The unemployment rate shows the number of people employed to unemployed. As for the "participial employment rate," no surprise. The Baby Boomers are in full retirement mode. Of course there are fewer people employed overall when the average age of a US Citizen is 37 today and 30 when Regan was president. We currently have the oldest US population in American History. When you take a look at the nonretired, the unemployment rate is closer to 5%. The official number is exactly 5%: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

 

[ermackey]

No it doesn't. That graph id BS. Simple math, when obama took office, the idiot Bush had built up 4 trillion in debt. 7 years into your idiot's term, the debt is 20 trillion. That means he is responsible for 80% of the nation's current debt. Your graph is a lie. BTW, obama has created more debt than ALL other presidents in history combined. Your graph is a lie.

But, what should I expect from a socialist wannabee that is either stupid enough to think printing more money lowers debt or corrupt enough to lie about it. If that were the case, the richest country on earth would be the one with the biggest printing press.

I don't think you know how recessions work. The debt exploded because Tax Receipts collapsed during the recession.

And by the way, Regan also created more debt than all previous presidents combined.

Here is a good article on debt spending per president. The data does not always align with rhetoric nor popular belief: http://useconomy.about.com/od/usdebtanddeficit/p/US-Debt-by-President.htm

 

[Cruiserhog]

compare LA economy before Jindal vs during Jindal.

apples and oranges...5/gallon gasoline

 

[Cruiserhog]

Blah, blah ,blah. you are so FOS. You can't keep printing money w/o eventually collapsing the value. Obama spends money on crap like a drunk lottery winner while you cheerlead and throw out BS just like your hero. You surely can't be as stupid as you post.

i love it when uniformed people make asses out of themselves...it becomes fun to then make them look even more foolish

Obama has kept spending at pre Bush levels...how in the hell do you think they have managed to trim a trillion dollar of defecit spending. The national debt was growing at 1.3 trillion per year early in Obama's admin and now its only growing at 400 B so please keep on speaking/posting about a subject where you know nothing

 

[Cruiserhog]

I don't think you know how recessions work. The debt exploded because Tax Receipts collapsed during the recession.

And by the way, Regan also created more debt than all previous presidents combined.

Here is a good article on debt spending per president. The data does not always align with rhetoric nor popular belief: http://useconomy.about.com/od/usdebtanddeficit/p/US-Debt-by-President.htm

I would add two unfunded wars and an unfunded entitlement too

 

[ermackey]

i love it when uniformed people make asses out of themselves...it becomes fun to then make them look even more foolish

Obama has kept spending at pre Bush levels...how in the hell do you think they have managed to trim a trillion dollar of deficit spending. The national debt was growing at 1.3 trillion per year early in Obama's admin and now its only growing at 400 B so please keep on speaking/posting about a subject where you know nothing

Here is a nice couple of articles by the liberal rag - Forbes. They even talk about how Obama has had the smallest increase of expenditures since Eisenhower. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspi...nder-just-like-his-predecessors/#6abadbd13036
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickung...ld-you-believe-its-barack-obama/#63cbcc157eca

Don't let the facts get in the way of a good argument.

FUN FACT!

Who was the last President to pay off the national debt?

 

[rzrbk7777]

i love it when uniformed people make asses out of themselves...it becomes fun to then make them look even more foolish

Obama has kept spending at pre Bush levels...how in the hell do you think they have managed to trim a trillion dollar of defecit spending. The national debt was growing at 1.3 trillion per year early in Obama's admin and now its only growing at 400 B so please keep on speaking/posting about a subject where you know nothing

I love it when libs throw out BS. You two seem to be the only folks in America that don't realize what the debt is, or what the debt was when Obama's sorry ass took office. Again, 4 trillion then, right at 20 trillion now. See how well that fits your numbers. 400 billion now you say? We gave 150 billion to Iran so they could buy nukes from North Korea. Obama can waste that much w/o ever leaving the golf course. Of course, being liberals, facts mean squat to you, it's all about feelings.

 

[rzrbk7777]

I don't think you know how recessions work. The debt exploded because Tax Receipts collapsed during the recession.

And by the way, Regan also created more debt than all previous presidents combined.

Here is a good article on debt spending per president. The data does not always align with rhetoric nor popular belief: http://useconomy.about.com/od/usdebtanddeficit/p/US-Debt-by-President.htm

It's Reagan, Mr. Intellect.

 

[ermackey]

It's Reagan, Mr. Intellect.

Not with my autocorrect and voice recognition. And I am tired of correcting it back.

 

[Hogeye73]

I'm not sure how this thread took a turn to our National public debt. Shouldn't we be talking about beefing up recruiting efforts even more in the state of Louisiana because of the uncertainty of LSU football. Even if they(LA) pass the budget this year doesn't mean that the problem goes away. This should scare Louisiana kids from ever signing with LSU. We need to get down there and pull them up to the top of the boot!

 

[ermackey]

I love it when libs throw out BS. You two seem to be the only folks in America that don't realize what the debt is, or what the debt was when Obama's sorry ass took office. Again, 4 trillion then, right at 20 trillion now. See how well that fits your numbers. 400 billion now you say? We gave 150 billion to Iran so they could buy nukes from North Korea. Obama can waste that much w/o ever leaving the golf course. Of course, being liberals, facts mean squat to you, it's all about feelings.

I am not sure you know what a fact is. I have provided facts with links for each of my claims. Very little emotion. You have continued your hysterics with no facts supporting your claims.

Look. I get it. You are a racist old dude with high blood pressure and a computer. That is all you need to motivate your opinions. You will always have a few like-minded people to jump on board to bash the black president. Unfortunately, that does not win you a debate, it only makes you an . You are wrong on the facts and have offered none in support of your arguments. If you would like to actually supply support for your arguement, it is always welcome. You should give it a try and leave the knee-jerk stuff alone. Stop. Think. Support. Type.

 

[rzrbk7777]

I am not sure you know what a fact is. I have provided facts with links for each of my claims. Very little emotion. You have continued your hysterics with no facts supporting your claims.

Look. I get it. You are a racist old dude with high blood pressure and a computer. That is all you need to motivate your opinions. You will always have a few like-minded people to jump on board to bash the black president. Unfortunately, that does not win you a debate, it only makes you an . You are wrong on the facts and have offered none in support of your arguments. If you would like to actually supply support for your arguement, it is always welcome. You should give it a try and leave the knee-jerk stuff alone. Stop. Think. Support. Type.

I'm racist? I didn't even know you were black/Hispanic/gay or whatever it is you think causes me to dislike you, beyond the fact that you are a socialist little moron with a degree that blinds you to the fact that educated and intelligent aren't always the same thing. I liked Herman Cain and I love Ben Carson. They are the only two presidential candidates in my life I ever donated to. I hate Obama's guts not b/c of the color of his skin, but b/c of the fact that he has weakened our country, divided our country, and tried his very best to bankrupt our country while sniveling little pricks like you cheerlead him on. Typical chicken shit move by you to pull the race card, zippy. It's who you are and what you do. You are more racist than I have ever been, you elitist little punk. I don't think black people need me to survive. Your whole political being requires that they remain dependent on jerks like you to survive on whatever handouts you give them through your bloated, wasteful, and corrupt type of government. You are about handouts, not hands up.

As for your facts, charts, graphs, etc., any of them that don't add up to 16 trillion dollars in new debt over the last 7 years are pure BS. Lies actually. But BS charts, facts, and figures are staples of your beliefs. That would tell you something if you were nearly as smart as you like to think you are. Zippy.

 

[ermackey]

I'm racist? I didn't even know you were black/Hispanic/gay or whatever it is you think causes me to dislike you, beyond the fact that you are a socialist little moron with a degree that blinds you to the fact that educated and intelligent aren't always the same thing. I liked Herman Cain and I love Ben Carson. They are the only two presidential candidates in my life I ever donated to. I hate Obama's guts not b/c of the color of his skin, but b/c of the fact that he has weakened our country, divided our country, and tried his very best to bankrupt our country while sniveling little pricks like you cheerlead him on. Typical chicken shit move by you to pull the race card, zippy. It's who you are and what you do. You are more racist than I have ever been, you elitist little punk. I don't think black people need me to survive. Your whole political being requires that they remain dependent on jerks like you to survive on whatever handouts you give them through your bloated, wasteful, and corrupt type of government. You are about handouts, not hands up.

As for your facts, charts, graphs, etc., any of them that don't add up to 16 trillion dollars in new debt over the last 7 years are pure BS. Lies actually. But BS charts, facts, and figures are staples of your beliefs. That would tell you something if you were nearly as smart as you like to think you are. Zippy.

Still no facts and you have a black friend?

 

[rzrbk7777]

Still no facts and you have a black friend?

You mean other than 16 trillion in new debt under your buddy doesn't jive with your bogus little propaganda chart? Figured that was fact enough. You are such a shallow little fraud and way too arrogant to see it. Zippy.