It was proven that Peyton lied continuously
Jump to conclusions much? Lol.
It was proven that Peyton lied continuously
Exactly. I mean I like them both BUT I love Peyton. He is a great guy and a great ambassador but he is human too. To bash Cam over something so simple is asinine.It was proven that Peyton lied continuously
I guess you didn't read the articleJump to conclusions much? Lol.
Who has? I think most agree he did what was alleged based on the evidence, but are questioning why it's being brought up again.I don't see how anyone can support Peyton Manning in this issue.
Because it was kept semi undercover the first time.Who has? I think most agree he did what was alleged based on the evidence, but are questioning why it's being brought up again.
You could've read all about it many times over the years. Was talked about a lot during the Jamie's Winston incident.Because it was kept semi undercover the first time.
You could've read all about it many times over the years. Was talked about a lot during the Jamie's Winston incident.
There was the incident, Peyton apologized to her then. Later he wrote a book with his father and apologized about it, without putting her name in the book. She brought a suit agasint him saying she was the unamed woman and people all over the campus read the book and knew it was her. So Peyton resettled with her, after she made her name public by bringing a lawsuit 7/8 years after the incident.I had not heard of it until today ... still, if true, it was more than just a single incident/poor judgment made as a young man, he allegedly continued to go on offense to smear the lady. Long time ago? Yes. Does that situation define PM as a person? Maybe, maybe not. People mature and learn from their mistakes, and their character improves.
I agree with you, though, that this should not be front-page headline material, becasue it's not "news", it's "olds."
I will say that it is the kind of thing that if run back through the media spin cycle could affect perception not only of Manning in general, but could also affect the public's perception of his "word" regarding his categorical denial of using steroids. Unless that is ever proven, it may not matter, but folks might still believe he is a liar/manipulator and think he did it anyway.
Brady was never proven to have deflated footballs, but part of the mass perception that he did is tied to previous cheating by the Patriots. Once there is a history, facts are not as powerful as perception in public opinion.
A college athlete shoes his junk in the locker room and a female reporter sees it. My gosh what has this world come to. I swear some of you must live perfect lives. Lordy mercy.
You've really simplified the incident and misstated facts she wasn't a reporter and it was quite a bit more than "flashing" you should read or reread the court documents.A college athlete shoes his junk in the locker room and a female reporter sees it. My gosh what has this world come to. I swear some of you must live perfect lives. Lordy mercy.
There are LOTS of crazy rumors about Eli and Peyton. I personally believe that where there is smoke there is fire, but there is also the aspect of who they are and who their father is. I didn't click the link, by the way, just speaking from stuff I've read over the years.
Also, everyone has an agenda. That doesn't change facts
I think the lady in question in all this is due her day in many, many ways. By all legal testimony, she did not do anywhere near what she was accused of doing. And, not only that, her career(s) were affected by things done that were not wanted or allowed based on law and an agreement they both had afterwards.
That's not her fault and that should be rectified.
Where I think we get caught up in things is we allow the promotion and hype to affect our views of situations like this due either to celebrity or due to a general denial that someone would do not only the original action in this situation, but then subsequent matters that came up after.
Maybe Manning changed - a lot - after what happened when he was in college. Boy, I sure have. I can look back at how immature I was. It would mean more to me - ha, like my feelings matter, which, they don't - that he deals with this openly and in a way that makes this lady whole. That would be a better display of character than anything he's done on the field.
After all, I would say that more than anything when we are wronged, we just want to be apologized to. She deserves more than an apology and if anyone could be in a position to ensure that happens, it's Manning.
This didn't go to trial. The court didn't have an agenda or an opinion. The court docs are only her side from her attorneys. Could very well be 100% true. Like I've said, i'm very surprised posters on this board haven't heard this story many times. It's been on his wiki page for years.Must be awesome to have white male privilege. I even seen posters say the writer must have an agenda. Does the court have an agenda against Manning? Do all the people that testified against him also have one? Lol But I'm not surprised that he'll have apologist given the agenda of some. But Cam didn't want to answer questions and celebrates TD's lol
There was the incident, Peyton apologized to her then. Later he wrote a book with his father and apologized about it, without putting her name in the book. She brought a suit agasint him saying she was the unamed woman and people all over the campus read the book and knew it was her. So Peyton resettled with her, after she made her name public by bringing a lawsuit 7/8 years after the incident.
I bet if she had listened to the people that told her to blame a black player this would have been front page. Change Peyton's name to Jerome or Andre and this would have been a different outcome. I've never heard of this story till now. How many testified against Manning again? Even teammates? Andre or Jerome wouldn't get the benefit of the doubt but he will. I just love how the double standard is out on front street for all to see. sad part is I'm not surprised Of the downplay. I actually expect it. As they say on the MB, #animals!!!This didn't go to trial. The court didn't have an agenda or an opinion. The court docs are only her side from her attorneys. Could very well be 100% true. Like I've said, i'm very surprised posters on this board haven't heard this story many times. It's been on his wiki page for years.
Tomorrow there will be a story about someone. Anyone. They might be black. The fact that that story is reported and this one isn't regurgitated for the 50th time isn't white privilege. It's called news for a reason. It's wasn't reported again for the same reason no one "reported" Cam's laptop ordeal, or Greg Olsen's rap song, or Von Miller's steroids.........
Not news.
I bet if she had listened to the people that told her to blame a black player this would have been front page. Change Peyton's name to Jerome or Andre and this would have been a different outcome. I've never heard of this story till now. How many testified against Manning again? Even teammates? Andre or Jerome wouldn't get the benefit of the doubt but he will. I just love how the double standard is out on front street for all to see. sad part is I'm not surprised Of the downplay. I actually expect it. As they say on the MB, #animals!!!
I bet if she had listened to the people that told her to blame a black player this would have been front page. Change Peyton's name to Jerome or Andre and this would have been a different outcome. I've never heard of this story till now. How many testified against Manning again? Even teammates? Andre or Jerome wouldn't get the benefit of the doubt but he will. I just love how the double standard is out on front street for all to see. sad part is I'm not surprised Of the downplay. I actually expect it. As they say on the MB, #animals!!!
Exactly. I mean I like them both BUT I love Peyton. He is a great guy and a great ambassador but he is human too. To bash Cam over something so simple is asinine.
I bet if she had listened to the people that told her to blame a black player this would have been front page. Change Peyton's name to Jerome or Andre and this would have been a different outcome. I've never heard of this story till now. How many testified against Manning again? Even teammates? Andre or Jerome wouldn't get the benefit of the doubt but he will. I just love how the double standard is out on front street for all to see. sad part is I'm not surprised Of the downplay. I actually expect it. As they say on the MB, #animals!!!
Must be awesome to have white male privilege. I even seen posters say the writer must have an agenda. Does the court have an agenda against Manning? Do all the people that testified against him also have one? Lol But I'm not surprised that he'll have apologist given the agenda of some. But Cam didn't want to answer questions and celebrates TD's lol
In other words, you're jealous of his success. I get it, but it's time to let go man. Millions of other kids do much worse than have a father shop you around. Glad I'm not so simple minded.Cam has always been scum. It was proven that he was shopped around and landed at Auburn...yet the NCAA, Cam, Auburn, and Cam's diddy found a way for Cam to be eligible. He should never have been allowed to play. He was a scumbag at Florida and got punted for it. He goes to JUCO...then to Auburn. Because of him being at Auburn, Arkansas didnt play for the SEC Title in 2010 vs a weak Carolina team. I have no interest in Cam and hope he consistently fails because he has been a consistently bad person. Period. Him being a titty baby is nothing new. I have never seen an adult actually throw themselves on the ground and flop around like a hooked fish until Cam Newton, but him being the first to put that on display to me isn't surprising at all.
Dude you really need to let the hate go. You need to get out more often.There's some truth to that. Using it to defend Cam is a zero sum argument.
In other words, you're jealous of his success. I get it, but it's time to let go man. Millions of other kids do much worse than have a father shop you around. Glad I'm not so simple minded.
Oh, so you live your life sin free? I'm impressed. Congrats on the perfection Cowboy. You are jealous of his success, it's ok to admit it. All the guy does is win. From JC, to the SEC and now the pros. Is getting perfect? Hell no. Does he act spoiled and immature? Yes, but to call him scum because his "diddy" shopped him around reeks of ignorance. I'm sure you're aware that he isn't the only one that's been paid, this is if the rumors are true, to go to a school, right? Don't hate the player, hate the game. I don't worship the guy, or any other athlete, but, to me, the guy has more than made up for his past. Besides, when you went to college you didn't do some stupid shit?You must be a beta. Jealousy doesn't even enter my mind. I don't get jealous or starstruck by anyone or anything. Cam Newton is an exceptionally unimpressive person to me, and I have no interest in him or his career. Anyone who has seen his career unfold from the beginning and is impressed by him is the definition of a simple mind. I remember him as a Gator. I remember him playing behind Tebow knowing how good he was. His talent is Bo Jackson unique. Who he is as a person minus that talent...common and unimpressive at best...on average he is completely unnoticeable....at worst a common criminal. But, you go ahead and be impressed.
Today. I don't know if the story should be looked at as the matter of record more so than the actual court documents it references and that are included in the story.
I remember when the book came out the admission that he "dropped his pants" in front of a trainer but with all this extra context, that takes on a new dimension. And, it would seem the Mannings broke a confidentiality agreement when they did that.
Who knows where it may or may not go.
You can read it here.
im not defending Cam. He's a grown man. He can defend himself. There's a obvious bias. I've never heard a complaint about Aaron Rogers and what he does. Y'all must be in fantasy land if y'all don't think there isn't a bias or want me to believe there isn't one.There's some truth to that. Using it to defend Cam is a zero sum argument.
The legal system works how it's supposed to work is when a guy named Peyton is involved. Still doesn't take away from the FACT that everyone testified against him. And they tried to sway her to blame black guys. There's another example being played out right now. Bill Cosby did what he did. But Guess who else, Bill Clinton. I see no difference in the situation other than one is black and the other will never be held accountable cause he's white.Do you understand how litigation works? What you are seeing in the documentation is a response to a motion to dismiss her complaint. It was not included to see all his information. So the article is completely one sided based on her attorneys attempt to refute the motion to dismiss. I don't know the truth about what did happen, just that this is one side of the argument.
im not defending Cam. He's a grown man. He can defend himself. There's a obvious bias. I've never heard a complaint about Aaron Rogers and what he does. Y'all must be in fantasy land if y'all don't think there isn't a bias or want me to believe there isn't one.
The legal system works how it's supposed to work is when a guy named Peyton is involved. Still doesn't take away from the FACT that everyone testified against him. And they tried to sway her to blame black guys. There's another example being played out right now. Bill Cosby did what he did. But Guess who else, Bill Clinton. I see no difference in the situation other than one is black and the other will never be held accountable cause he's white cause they both have money.