ADVERTISEMENT

Wazzu Fires Rolovich

If we are going for proof, how do you call all the Dems and Pubs crooks?

I think many are, and definitely believe Trump is. But you guys are throwing out wild accusations on everyone else then asking for proof on Trump.
"He makes Nixon look like a choir boy."

This was the comment I was targeting. Anyone who has been in Congress long enough to accrue 10's to 100's of millions of dollars in wealth is a crook.
 
Well this started out about a football coach in a smaller town in southeast Washington...but as always happens....it morphs into a Trump discussion.
Like CNN, many don't have much to talk about with Trump out of office
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawg Chief
Dems don't like Joey anymore than anyone else does. He won because it was a vote against The Donald.

Pubs refused to acknowledge (and still do) the power of the mail in ballot. They better start to recognize it. It's not going anywhere.

Donald also will not let the 2020 election go. He is going to drag that crap I to the 2024 primary and national election. It's embarrassing and pathetic.

He will get his doors blown off again if he doesn't change some of that narrative and accept the new way of voting.

For our country, I hope he does.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lefty8
I can answer that. They all wanted Trump out. Dems pubs all the crooks. He was cutting into their Chinese cash flow by putting USA first with all his policies. Established pubs like McConnell wanted Trump out as bad as dems did. He was hurting the globalist agenda.
Facts
 
Link that shyt
The shyt is linked.





 
The shyt is linked.






Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtsuhog85
So Mar-a-Lago is a dump?
Acquiring things before politics and during politics are two entirely different things. You are conflating wealth that Trump already had. Now, could Trump have acquired his wealth due to being a crook? Sure. Far different than elected officials using their political positions to steal from the public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_j0hjgb7us6s1a
I can answer that. They all wanted Trump out. Dems pubs all the crooks. He was cutting into their Chinese cash flow by putting USA first with all his policies. Established pubs like McConnell wanted Trump out as bad as dems did. He was hurting the globalist agenda.

So siding with Putin over our own intelligence services is putting USA first? Inciting a riot to overthrow the US Capitol is putting USA first?

Sounds more like a traitor to me.
 
Ya probably didn't realize, because the type of news you watch wouldn't have it on, but here in Georgia two men were just fired from the election committee for shredding voter registration forms.

They were from heavy blue Fulton County. The same country that stopped tallying votes for the night, because of a "water main leak". Later it was found that a toilet overflowed. (Probably Republican ballots). Then a massive dump (no pun) of Biden only ballots cast with no folds and no down votes were counted while everyone was gone for the night.

600k new dem voters in Georgia.
They won't listen
 
Well, at least you waited awhile after not responding to an argument you were losing. Vaccine mandates are racist by current liberal/authoritarian logic.
Unlike you, I don't care about winning or losing random arguments on the internet. As far as I know, I replied to your last post directed at me, but please feel free to let me know if I didn't.

*edit* Whoops, I didn't reply to your question asking if I've visited NYC lately. The answer is no. Damn, you totally won that argument, congrats!

I was in DC around February though, and wasn't carded there at all.
 
Unlike you, I don't care about winning or losing random arguments on the internet. As far as I know, I replied to your last post directed at me, but please feel free to let me know if I didn't.

*edit* Whoops, I didn't reply to your question asking if I've visited NYC lately. The answer is no. Damn, you totally won that argument, congrats!
Well, when my entire life is being dictated by some weird cultish system that has swallowed everything in our society, I do look at winning/losing.

You also said in the second comment of this thread that you would not be participating, yet you did and mainly to my comments.

This tells me that you subscribe to this weird “liberal” cult that follows zero logic and doesn’t care because the any means to get to the ends is necessary. Meaning, anything your group does to the opposition is right because it justifies the end goal. Your side can be racist, bigoted, misogynistic, etc. as long as it is toward those in the opposition.

Not saying that you necessarily do these things, but the comments you chose to reply to were me speaking to this crazy logic. And then you couldn’t answer.

That’s why I said you were losing. That is also why I think you belong to this group.
 
Well, when my entire life is being dictated by some weird cultish system that has swallowed everything in our society, I do look at winning/losing.

You also said in the second comment of this thread that you would not be participating, yet you did and mainly to my comments.

This tells me that you subscribe to this weird “liberal” cult that follows zero logic and doesn’t care because the any means to get to the ends is necessary. Meaning, anything your group does to the opposition is right because it justifies the end goal. Your side can be racist, bigoted, misogynistic, etc. as long as it is toward those in the opposition.

Not saying that you necessarily do these things, but the comments you chose to reply to were me speaking to this crazy logic. And then you couldn’t answer.

That’s why I said you were losing. That is also why I think you belong to this group.
I'm a registered Republican, I just despise Donald Trump and the cult that would jump off a bridge for him.
 
But the cult I am talking about is not Dem or Pub. The cult I am talking about is Authoritarianism which holds all of the institutional power in this country.

The Trump cult, as has been described, does not hold any institutional power.

So which one is the greatest threat?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: anon_j0hjgb7us6s1a
But the cult I am talking about is not Dem or Pub. The cult I am talking about is Authoritarianism which holds all of the institutional power in this country.

The Trump cult, as has been described, does not hold any institutional power.

So which one is the greatest threat?
Was the Biden cult not a threat before holding power? I feared them taking power for the past two years. Wouldn't any cult that has the potential of taking power be a threat?
 
So siding with Putin over our own intelligence services is putting USA first? Inciting a riot to overthrow the US Capitol is putting USA first?

Sounds more like a traitor to me.

So back to this General Miley, Trumps top General. He has openly acknowledged that he talked openly to our known adversary on the regular.

The FBI also ran a behind the scenes coup of a sitting president, with full involvement of many US senators. A staged Russia collusion to unseat a duly elected president.

Who knows what else hasn't been declassified yet.

Meanwhile, Biden bragged about getting an investigator fired for looking into a company that was known as a shell company for Russian and Ukrainian fraud. The same company that hired a sitting VPs unqualified son to run an energy company for huge sums of money.

Everytime a lib calls you something.

Well, somabeech, I got him fired.

 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_j0hjgb7us6s1a
Was the Biden cult not a threat before holding power? I feared them taking power for the past two years. Wouldn't any cult that has the potential of taking power be a threat?
I'm not even talking about a "Biden" cult. I am talking about how political correctness has led to the censorship of regular Americans in every facet of society. I am talking about the craziness that is being taught inside universities and how emotion is favored over logic. Words are violence. Silence is violence. Antifa is an idea. BLM can burn down cities without recourse because of inequity. Equality is bad (I know this because it is being taught at my university) and equity (equal outcomes) is the champion. No joking allowed about any group unless they are straight white christian males. Only white folks can be racist. There is no distinction between men and women, biologically or psychologically. Math is racist. The Lab Leak Theory is racist. A black republican is the black face of white supremacy (see LA Times). Black men are the white people of black people (see NYT). We are in a pandemic of the unvaccinated. China's oppression/genocide of the Uyger Muslims is a cultural issue. Defund the police and give up your gun rights. Victim status is a commodity. Latina/latino bad but latinx (a made up word) is good. Dozens, if not more, of definitions being changed (look up racism, vaccine, anti-vaccine).

I could go on and on and on.

Using principled logic to achieve outcomes is absent from those who control the institutions. The 3 pillars: Equity, inclusion, and diversity. They sound good, at first, until you realize these words are just a signal for those who are truly promoting them.

Equity: Equal outcomes due to the atrocities of the past. White people think they hit a homer run but started on third base. I get it. Slavery and Jim Crow put POC communities decades behind. But for equity to work, discrimination has to occur. The scales are weighted to help those who have been oppressed in the past to help them to catch up. Meaning, the majority in this country must be discriminated against for the rest to catch up. Discrimination is literally baked into the term. Equal outcomes will never be achieved and the issue will always remain unresolved.

Inclusion: I am all about inclusion and will fight for it. However, I don't see the side screaming for inclusivity actually being inclusive to those with different beliefs/values. This one blends into diversity in my opinion. There is not inclusion to a certain set of beliefs and people self-censor (my conservative classmates can attest).

Diversity: Love me some diversity. I truly do. It expands perspectives beyond the scope of a single culture's upbringing. What I can't stand is that those who subscribe to these terms and use diversity are only including race, gender, and sexual orientation as variables. I don't see any diversity of thought being discussed. Trust me, in my education these 3 pillars are being given to us from a fire hose. Never is diversity of thought and/or political beliefs ever included.

Edit: On gender, this doesn't include men. Especially the pale ones.

It is the grandiose moral authority that is raging through this country right now that is tearing it apart. Social media exacerbates it through hyper-polarized algorithms set for people to engage by enhancing emotions such as anger and disgust. It is mainstream media either lying through their teeth and/or choosing not to cover something because it doesn't fit this super-sensitive narrative.

The authoritarians use this against their enemies. Every single university, major corporation, our military, etc. has these 3 pillars at the forefront right now. Do you think these woke advertisements are being run in China? The Middle East? No, they aren't. These terms are placating to a specific audience that has grown immense power and is ****ing up everything.

It is a social credit system.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: anon_j0hjgb7us6s1a
So not serious. Thank goodness.
To his point, if that woman would have had pink hair and/or different skin color with a different set of beliefs, this would have been blasted as police brutality. There are climate protests happening right now and if one of them ends up getting shot point blank, you best believe every MSM will be leaving scorched earth. It's all about the narrative.
 
To his point, if that woman would have had pink hair and/or different skin color with a different set of beliefs, this would have been blasted as police brutality. There are climate protests happening right now and if one of them ends up getting shot point blank, you best believe every MSM will be leaving scorched earth. It's all about the narrative.
I work in an office building. We have security. We have locks. If someone breaks down the door and barges in, the security is supposed to stop them. If they tell them repeatedly to stop, and they don’t, sorry.

It sucks. But WTF do you expect to happen? Take the basic situation I gave and ramp up the intensity 100x and replace the people in my office with hated elected officials and you get what you got.

Whether you think another person would incorrectly scream police brutality if the persons color was different, doesn’t change whether it was right or wrong.
 
I work in an office building. We have security. We have locks. If someone breaks down the door and barges in, the security is supposed to stop them. If they tell them repeatedly to stop, and they don’t, sorry.

It sucks. But WTF do you expect to happen? Take the basic situation I gave and ramp up the intensity 100x and replace the people in my office with hated elected officials and you get what you got.

Whether you think another person would incorrectly scream police brutality if the persons color was different, doesn’t change whether it was right or wrong.
I am not defending the woman who was shot. All I am saying is that media only cares if certain personal parameters/factors are met. That is a fact.

I'll give you an example. Have you heard of the school shooting in Arlington, TX that happened recently?
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_j0hjgb7us6s1a
I think saying someone deserved to die in the context of the incident is rather much. Just me.
Maybe harsh wording, but she got what I would 100% expect to happen to me or anyone else in that scenario.

deserved - rightfully earned because of something done or qualities shown; merited.
 
Maybe harsh wording, but she got what I would 100% expect to happen to me or anyone else in that scenario.

deserved - rightfully earned because of something done or qualities shown; merited.
Sure, and I go by the saying "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" which is a good rule to live by. Saying she deserved it sounds a little heavy for me considering she wasn't armed. It was in the heat of the moment and his job was to protect our capital. I get it.

I think the same could be said of the Antifa scumbags who threw multiple firework mortars (think of a fireworks show you would take your kids) that exploded on police officers point blank. Over and over and over again. Most of them not even charged. I think there's an argument that these people who threw explosives deserved a piece of lead or two. And if the cops would have shot them, that media machine would have spun into hyper speed.
 
Sure, and I go by the saying "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" which is a good rule to live by. Saying she deserved it sounds a little heavy for me considering she wasn't armed. It was in the heat of the moment and his job was to protect our capital. I get it.

I think the same could be said of the Antifa scumbags who threw multiple firework mortars (think of a fireworks show you would take your kids) that exploded on police officers point blank. Over and over and over again. Most of them not even charged. I think there's an argument that these people who threw explosives deserved a piece of lead or two. And if the cops would have shot them, that media machine would have spun into hyper speed.
Don't disagree with second paragraph at all but that wasn't the topic.
 
Don't disagree with second paragraph at all but that wasn't the topic.
You will have to forgive me. I see these issues through an entirely different lens. Especially the culture war issues, as I have been watching it intensely for the past several years. The two are heavily connected IMO.
 
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawg Chief
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT