Morally, what's the difference between fighting dogs and hunting?
- Thread starter Charlie B Barkin
- Start date
The coke and sodomy involve consenting adults (hopefully). I don't believe the deer consent to be killed. When I was a teen I put food on the table rabbits, squirrel, and occasional deer. When the cost of game rose above what could bought in stores the allure was gone. I'm not saying any of it is right or wrong. When it comes to dog or cock fighting I will say some guys in shorts with knives strapped to their hands seems an appropriate consequence.
Its not true that animals were created to be turned into food, im guessing your bible told you that because I don't know anywhere else this is confirmed. Killing animals might be considered barbaric
Think about how selfish it is to kill a living animal and then have your picture taken with it laying dead beside you, in a news paper.
Humans think they are superior because they have been told by the same book that claims animals were created to be killed. Humans were given the intelligence while a cheetah was given speed trait. Doesn't make one trait superior over the other.
A cow was killed every time I eat a steak. But a Mexican was killed every time you snort a line.
Moral advantage: me.
Moral advantage: me.
Similar threads
