ADVERTISEMENT

2020 Election Results Controversy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Please watch this demo of Dominion voting system!

Don't know how Tommy Robinson, British right wing activist, obtained this video. Will be interesting if US right wing media picks up and validates.
 
Sen. Bernie Sanders admitted that fellow Democrats, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, were responsible for delaying urgently needed coronavirus relief by walking away from the White House’s offer of a $1.8 trillion coronavirus package.

In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper Monday, the socialist two-time presidential candidate noted Pelosi’s hypocrisy in endorsing a smaller bipartisan $908 million deal last week after rejecting the twice-as-large proposal from President Trump in October.

“Democrats walked away from that deal because they wanted $2.2 trillion,” Tapper said.

“That’s right!” Sanders (I-Vt.) responded, confirming it was Democrats, not Republicans, who were to blame for months of inaction.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._getting_out_into_the_open.html#ixzz6gEZCyTtE
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
 
Remember six weeks ago when the entirety of the mainstream media told us that even discussing these stories was pushing "Russian disinformation"?

The same know-it-all talking heads screaming "n
othing to see here."

 
Here’s how it went down… The news of Hunter Biden’s laptop broke wide open just before the 2020 election. The corporate media were desperate to throw a fire blanket over what they knew was a legitimate scandal.

“How do we do that?” they asked. “How do we kill a legitimate story?”

“Oh, I know… Let’s get our Deep State pals to tell us the lies we want to hear, just like they did for the four years of the Russia Collusion Hoax!”

Only this time, they will tell us the Hunter Biden laptop is a fake created by Russia, and that will allow us to not report what we know is the truth!

That’s exactly what the media and Deep State did.

 
As Breitbart News was first to report, Texas sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, arguing that they had made changes to their voting process outside their respective state legislatures, which the Constitution says must control the selection of presidential electors. Texas also argued that there were differences in voting procedures within these states, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. And it also argued that there were irregularities that resulted from these violations.
In addition to the original filing by the State of Texas, there are other filings, including:
  • A motion to intervene by President Donald Trump
  • An amici curiae (“friends of the court”) brief by Missouri, on behalf of itself and “Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia” in support of Texas’s case
  • An amici curiae brief filed by Carter Phillips and other “Never Trump” Republican opponents of the president, supporting Pennsylvania and the defendant states
  • An amici curiae brief filed by Roy Moore and other “constitutional attorneys” in support of the Texas case.
  • An amicus curiae brief filed by Arizona, urging the Court to act quickly
  • Responses to the Texas filing by each of the defendant states
  • An amici curiae brief filed by the District of Columbia and “States and territories of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Guam, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Washington” in support of Pennsylvania and the defendant states
  • A motion by Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Utah to intervene as plaintiffs
  • Two amicus curiae motions by members of the Pennsylvania house and senate, respectively, urging the Court to take the Texas case
  • An amicus curiae motion by the Christian Family Coalition in support of the Texas case
  • An amici curiae brief by the speaker and majority leader of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in support of the Texas case
  • A motion by “state legislators and voters” represented by the Justice Foundation and the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, seeking to intervene and join the case as plaintiffs; their complaint was also filed
  • An amici curiae brief by 105 Republican members of the House of Representatives
  • An amici curiae brief by elected officials from four states in support of the Texas case
  • An amicus curiae brief by the City of Detroit in support of Pennsylvania and the defendants
  • An amicus curiae brief by the Justice and Freedom Fund in support of the Texas case
 
Sharyl Attkisson:
When I was at CBS News, we followed strict guidelines as to when and how anonymous sources could be used. For example, anonymous sources were to be used only as a last resort if the information could not be gathered in another way. We were to disclose with as much specificity as possible any conflicts of interest the party might have and what type of position or access that person held or holds. Now, instead of quoting others, journalists merely make claims and determinations themselves, blending their opinion into hard news reporting, telling people which side is supposedly correct rather than letting the public decide. They even declare information to be fact as if they had personally confirmed it, when they could not possibly have done so.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/art...onest_reporters_speaks_out.html#ixzz6gHP7DbeO
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

 
After receiving the briefs and opposition from the four key battleground states Thursday, the next step by the Supreme Court will be to review whether to take a case as "a trial court," John Eastman, counsel to President Donald Trump and presidential scholar, said Thursday on Newsmax TV.

And the pressure on the high court to take that step is growing, he said.

"I suspect the Supreme Court is going to meet in conference [Friday] to decide whether to grant Texas' motion to file the original action," Eastman told Thursday's "Greg Kelly Reports." "And then they'll confront the issue like President Trump's motion to intervene.

"If they grant that Texas motion, they'll set a briefing schedule. They could even appoint a special master to look at some of underlying allegations of fraud."


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT