Last edited:
Congrats Joe Biden!!! #46 President of the United States!
- Thread starter mcbmd
- Start date
Should have followed that with the gif you said you’d begin to use on commitments
This doesn't look remotely similar to their official statements?
I am skeptical hippo.
Being shown on all the news outlets, it's legit. He's emailing news outlets now.
Can't be blocked by Twitter if you email people I guess.
Soooo, if Fox calls Nevada(which is looking likely very soon), Fox will be essentially saying Biden wins the election since they've already given him AZ.
I'd think they would normally retract their AZ call, but they keep doubling down on it, so we'll see.
I'd think they would normally retract their AZ call, but they keep doubling down on it, so we'll see.
Fox really fumbled this entire thing
Dude, it's from the news outlets.
Saying, "NBC twitter post was verified by NBC." Is not very comforting...it sure didn't seem to mean shit for all the D's with Bobulinski.
Their polling agency they use is SUUUUUPER left leaning...like gives a lot of money to the democratic party leaning.
They do things like this to put out a "fair and balanced" mindest - like hiring Donna Brazile. But the guy who they had on most of the night saw his last election tonight.
Gonna finish this week 50-48 Republican, with 2 run offs in GA in January. I imagine those both go red so 52-48 Republican.
- May 11, 2002
- 34,263
- 33,910
- 113
NICKEJACK FARMS.
Residents of Van Buren county followed suit when they heard the news.
Don't think Georgia does recounts...could be wrong let me look into it.
Edit, has to be within 0.5% to request a recount. You could be correct, sir!
- May 11, 2002
- 34,263
- 33,910
- 113
When it comes to following along, all he did was post what they are saying/doing.
omg another hall monitor
this is a no holds barred thread boys. or did you forget?
Can we all just laugh at Nate:
"Even though our data was off by 2 standard deviations, generally indicating our polling mechanisms are scientifically inaccurate, we just want to say....told you so."
"Even though our data was off by 2 standard deviations, generally indicating our polling mechanisms are scientifically inaccurate, we just want to say....told you so."
I’m just over here wondering why the Trump landslide never materialized.
Eh, do your thing...I'm just saying, it's all been very civil and there's no reason to get all up in a tussy.
Wait til these law suits/recounts/fraudulent votes are thrown out. It'll be clearer than Lake Hamilton.
Nevada has no idea how to run an election. They are saying they will be done in November 12th. Guess what Nevada? No one will give a shit by then.
Nevada is like a 5.4 3-star that delays signing day 3 times and calls a press conference each time to update everyone.
Nevada is like a 5.4 3-star that delays signing day 3 times and calls a press conference each time to update everyone.
Karl's right. All the prognostications had 90% Trump with an average of 350 electoral...
If we'd only listned to the Karl's of the world, we could have foreseen an election coming down to thousands of votes in 7 states (NC, GA, WI, MI, NV, AZ) to decide the election. It truly was a blue wave.
I honestly can’t wait for them to investigate because you KNOW there was tampering and fraud. Just comes down to how much and who did it. Going to be a shit show that I’ll have 3 buckets of popcorn ready for. It’s inevitable.
Plus states that had 90+% of their registered voters “vote”
- May 11, 2002
- 34,263
- 33,910
- 113
I'm on break and bored. Ain't no sugar water in my veins.
