A study in 2006 on Alzheimer's has been recently accused of being manipulated toward their intended hypothesis. This study was published by Nature, one of the highest regarded publications out there. Hundreds of millions of tax-payer dollars went toward finding a cure for Alzheimer's over the past 16 years with little results, much of which were based off of the results from this study. There are many "reputable" sources for this study, so search the inter-web to your heart's content.
Point being, science can be manipulated and corrupted. The Lancet published a fake study on hydroxychoriquin and once they were questioned on how they achieved such a large sample size of young people with severe symptoms from COVID over such a short amount of time, they withdrew the study which is an extremely rare occurrence for such a highly regarded publication.
Then there is the Pfizer adverse events report which is absolutely grotesque.
I will continue to ask questions while getting chastised, as a result. We will all find out in a few years anyway, one way or another.
Point being, science can be manipulated and corrupted. The Lancet published a fake study on hydroxychoriquin and once they were questioned on how they achieved such a large sample size of young people with severe symptoms from COVID over such a short amount of time, they withdrew the study which is an extremely rare occurrence for such a highly regarded publication.
Then there is the Pfizer adverse events report which is absolutely grotesque.
I will continue to ask questions while getting chastised, as a result. We will all find out in a few years anyway, one way or another.
Last edited:
