ADVERTISEMENT

OT Where do you stand on Issue 4?

Are you voting for or against on issue 4?

  • For

    Votes: 60 65.9%
  • Against

    Votes: 24 26.4%
  • Who cares you pothead

    Votes: 7 7.7%

  • Total voters
    91
I’ve got a med card and the thought of all of these ass holes bombarding the dispensaries really annoys me.

I wouldn’t care if they didn’t want to have rec and med in the same facility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pokerpig
That is definitely more of a question with this than other medicines. But I think having a recreational category that is taxed and a medical one that is not taxed would be helpful. Most people that want to smoke it recreationally and have no medical reason will not seek a prescription just to avoid the tax if they have not already done that. Then the people that actually need it medically can have it more affordably
At this point you’re probably right. Except the ones turning 18 every year (or 21, whatever the age is)
 
  • Like
Reactions: LawHawg4
whats funny is that a good portion that have cards that don’t need them are pushing against this bill because they don’t wanna lose what they have.

Many won’t go back and get the cards if it passes.

I don’t want it to pass for a few reasons but not bc I think rec is a bad thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lefty8
The state revoked one of the cultivator's licenses today. Holy $hit

The state notified Judge Herb Wright in a letter Monday that it is moving forward with revoking the cultivation license of River Valley Relief Cultivation after the judge ruled last week that a state commission had issued the license in error.
The letter from Senior Assistant Attorney General Kate Donoven, who represented the state agency defendants in the case, said “This letter is to advise the Court that the defendants are taking the necessary steps to revoke the cultivation license at issue in the above captioned case in compliance with the Court’s order dated November 3, 2022.”
The letter seems to be an indication that the state will not appeal Wright’s ruling in which the judge found the state Medical Marijuana Commission should not have awarded a cultivation license to Storm Nolan and River Valley Relief Cultivation in 2020.

In his ruling last week, Wright stopped short of revoking River Valley’s license, saying that did not fall within his authority but did say that the state should “take all steps necessary to remedy these violations.”
 
The state revoked one of the cultivator's licenses today. Holy $hit

The state notified Judge Herb Wright in a letter Monday that it is moving forward with revoking the cultivation license of River Valley Relief Cultivation after the judge ruled last week that a state commission had issued the license in error.
The letter from Senior Assistant Attorney General Kate Donoven, who represented the state agency defendants in the case, said “This letter is to advise the Court that the defendants are taking the necessary steps to revoke the cultivation license at issue in the above captioned case in compliance with the Court’s order dated November 3, 2022.”
The letter seems to be an indication that the state will not appeal Wright’s ruling in which the judge found the state Medical Marijuana Commission should not have awarded a cultivation license to Storm Nolan and River Valley Relief Cultivation in 2020.

In his ruling last week, Wright stopped short of revoking River Valley’s license, saying that did not fall within his authority but did say that the state should “take all steps necessary to remedy these violations.”
The judge presiding over the case is named Herb? You can't make this shit up.
 
So what counts as a tier 1 cultivator?

This video says dispensaries will be allowed to grow up to 100 plants, which is double their current limit of 50.

Also says tier 1 cultivators have no plant limits and tier 2 will be limited to 250, which all new licenses will be tier 2.

I believe I may have been incorrect in my earlier posts. After re-reading it does appear that issue 4 would add 12 cultivators with that 250 cap. That doesn’t make any sense to me, but it does appear that you were correct with your previous post. My apologies for stating otherwise!
 
I believe I may have been incorrect in my earlier posts. After re-reading it does appear that issue 4 would add 12 cultivators with that 250 cap. That doesn’t make any sense to me, but it does appear that you were correct with your previous post. My apologies for stating otherwise!
All good!

I would assume someone put that in there to protect the original 8 cultivators so that they wouldn't face more opposition to it.
 
What are your reasons against it?

Obviously just personal…

Using rec weed to get tons
of other dollars for more spending
on jargon

Without decriminalizing out right it
does nothing for herbal (pricing ,
control, standards etc are gonna be
up to big weed companies as every
other business)
- but mainly the
lack of exactly what they intend.

I hate the fact that it doesn’t allow more people to come in and compete. I don’t like that they are lumping in medical facilities with rec facilities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RHS_Cyclone
What substances are the most dangerous and why. Alcohol tobacco or marijuana. If you think mj is more dangerous and harmful to society please give any fact as to why.
Should that really even be the question? Fairness isn't what matters. The question should be, "is it good for society?" Not "is it better than alcohol?"

We don't need that pot smoker logic around here
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotspringsroadhog
Should that really even be the question? Fairness isn't what matters. The question should be, "is it good for society?" Not "is it better than alcohol?"

We don't need that pot smoker logic around here
Its really a simple ? What substances are the most dangerous?
Prohibition isnt good for society. The things that are caused by mj and drug Prohibition are far worse than the drugs themselves. The list is long.

It would be best if no one smoked drank or ate at McDonald's. But we do.
 
Should that really even be the question? Fairness isn't what matters. The question should be, "is it good for society?" Not "is it better than alcohol?"

We don't need that pot smoker logic around here
I grew up in Nevada where It’s been legal for years.

The questions should be whether the law will stop use of it and whether the drug can cause substantial immediate bodily harm when used responsibly, and with weed, the answer to both is no. Legalize it, take the tax revenue, put It into education and the economy.
 
Its really a simple ? What substances are the most dangerous?
Prohibition isnt good for society. The things that are caused by mj and drug Prohibition are far worse than the drugs themselves. The list is long.

It would be best if no one smoked drank or ate at McDonald's. But we do.
I grew up in Nevada where It’s been legal for years.

The questions should be whether the law will stop use of it and whether the drug can cause substantial immediate bodily harm when used responsibly, and with weed, the answer to both is no. Legalize it, take the tax revenue, put It into education and the economy.
Is it bad for society?
I'm not convinced if it's good or bad and see the argument for both. I definitely lean towards personal freedom but also think the narrative that weed doesn't hurt anyone other than the user or even that it doesn't hurt the user is ludicrous. So I'm undecided and didn't vote for or against.

All I was saying was comparing it to something else doesn't really make any sense
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille.Oatm3al
I don’t really care one way or the other but the only revenue it can generate is if out of state money comes in. It’s not coming from Oklahoma that is for sure. Casinos are the same. It doesn’t create money. Go look at Tunica 20 years later, no money came in to that community it appears. Light up stay home and smile.
 
I don’t really care one way or the other but the only revenue it can generate is if out of state money comes in. It’s not coming from Oklahoma that is for sure. Casinos are the same. It doesn’t create money. Go look at Tunica 20 years later, no money came in to that community it appears. Light up stay home and smile.
Mississippi has a lot more four lane highways than we do. They built a lot of them during the casino boom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bentonjd55
Should that really even be the question? Fairness isn't what matters. The question should be, "is it good for society?" Not "is it better than alcohol?"

We don't need that pot smoker logic around here
Its really a simple ? What substances are the most dangerous?
Prohibition isnt good for society. The things that are caused by mj and drug Prohibition are far worse than the drugs themselves. The list is long.

It would be best if no one smoked drank or ate at McDonald's. But we do.

When alcohol Prohibition ended there were a bunch of feds about to be unemployed. So the take something that had been around for hundreds of years and make it illegal so they could stay employed. I
I'm not convinced if it's good or bad and see the argument for both. I definitely lean towards personal freedom but also think the narrative that weed doesn't hurt anyone other than the user or even that it doesn't hurt the user is ludicrous. So I'm undecided and didn't vote for or against.

All I was saying was comparing it to something else doesn't really make any sense
Explain to me how using mj responsibility hurts anyone if its legal.

Specific examples please.
 
Its really a simple ? What substances are the most dangerous?
Prohibition isnt good for society. The things that are caused by mj and drug Prohibition are far worse than the drugs themselves. The list is long.

It would be best if no one smoked drank or ate at McDonald's. But we do.

When alcohol Prohibition ended there were a bunch of feds about to be unemployed. So the take something that had been around for hundreds of years and make it illegal so they could stay employed. I
Explain to me how using mj responsibility hurts anyone if its legal.

Specific examples please.
MJ has taken the motivation of a lot of people and caused them to underachieve. I could give you names of people I know personally, but that wouldn't matter. We all know people who fall into that category.

That being said, I'm a firm believer in letting people do what they want, provided they aren't harming anyone else in the process, and provided that they have to live with the results of their bad decisions without me or anyone else bailing them out. Smoke (or drink) to your heart's content, but don't ask me to send you money to pay your living expenses through tax dollars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaltonG
MJ has taken the motivation of a lot of people and caused them to underachieve. I could give you names of people I know personally, but that wouldn't matter. We all know people who fall into that category.

That being said, I'm a firm believer in letting people do what they want, provided they aren't harming anyone else in the process, and provided that they have to live with the results of their bad decisions without me or anyone else bailing them out. Smoke (or drink) to your heart's content, but don't ask me to send you money to pay your living expenses through tax dollars.
Lazy people smoking weed does not change if you take it out the equations.

If Simply saying mj causes people to underachieve is your only reason to support prohibition than you are making my point.
 

Lazy people smoking weed does not change if you take it out the equations.

If Simply saying mj causes people to underachieve is your only reason to support prohibition than you are making my point.
I don't support prohibition. You asked for examples. I provided a big one.

The downsides from keeping weed illegal far outweigh the negatives to society as whole from legalization. But it bothers me when hardcore advocates act as if MJ is a miracle cure for everything with no negative effects.
 
Should that really even be the question? Fairness isn't what matters. The question should be, "is it good for society?" Not "is it better than alcohol?"

We don't need that pot smoker logic around here
BS! In a free country, not the government, or anybody else, should have the right to tell an adult what they can and cannot do to themselves. Women can get abortions based on the fact that the government agrees it's their bodies, and the women themselves should be the ones to make all decisions effecting same. But I can't legally smoke a joint? Why do women have rights that I don't have? We all know the answer to that, and it has nothing to do with freedom of choice.
 
Should that really even be the question? Fairness isn't what matters. The question should be, "is it good for society?" Not "is it better than alcohol?"

We don't need that pot smoker logic around here
delete
 
I don't support prohibition. You asked for examples. I provided a big one.

The downsides from keeping weed illegal far outweigh the negatives to society as whole from legalization. But it bothers me when hardcore advocates act as if MJ is a miracle cure for everything with no negative effects.
Gotcha. Been a daily smoker for 35 yrs and i get up go to work and come home and mow just like everyone. Only reason i dont smoke more is because it makes me want to eat 24/7.

If someone is lazy and unproductive its rarely caused by just weed. Weed dont make people loosers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille.Oatm3al
I just don't want to smell it everywhere I go. Vegas smell like weed everywhere you go and New Orleans has a zesty mix of urine, mildew and weed.

This! I know I am a little late to the discussion but I was on a #leafpeeping tour in New England a couple of weeks ago and the smell was awful. Seems the cheapest skunkweed out there is the preferred one. It was everywhere.
 
I think you missed my point completely
I actually might have, but basing my freedoms on what's good for "society" just riles my ass. Sounded like the Russians telling their citizens that everything they have actually belongs to the state, and everything they do is for the good of the state, and personal freedom is nonexistent. Sounding more like America every day.
 
Lazy people smoking weed does not change if you take it out the equations.

If Simply saying mj causes people to underachieve is your only reason to support prohibition than you are making my point.
Well since legalizing in Co there has been a huge increase in:

Minors smoking
Deaths while high(mostly driving)
Accidents involving people who have smoked(killing other people)
Adult usage

I'm sure the list goes on of negatives. Also, people underachieving is a big deal. People are societies greatest resource and more things that turn people into drains instead of contributors is definitely an issue. Not to mention the cultural impact it has by those negative influences impacting the next generation.


I'd say on the whole it's garbage, however I'm a fan of letting people make their own mistakes and try to be humble enough to understand I am wrong plenty so that's my conflict. But anyone that thinks it is "simple" clearly is biased or hasn't thought it through
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigmac2
This! I know I am a little late to the discussion but I was on a #leafpeeping tour in New England a couple of weeks ago and the smell was awful. Seems the cheapest skunkweed out there is the preferred one. It was everywhere.
Kinda like going into a bar and smelling alcohol or cigarettes on every ones breath and clothes. Yep, alcohol should be illegal as well as cigarettes, I can't stand the smell of either. And don't get me started on cabbage cooking, or my wifes home permanent solution, both should be illegal for the smell alone. :)
 
Gotcha. Been a daily smoker for 35 yrs and i get up go to work and come home and mow just like everyone. Only reason i dont smoke more is because it makes me want to eat 24/7.

If someone is lazy and unproductive its rarely caused by just weed. Weed dont make people loosers.
A lot of people do that and are fine. Hell, there are people who regularly use cocaine, pills, and probably even harder addictive drugs who are functional and even successful in their chosen fields.

I agree that most fückups have a tendency towards doing it anyway, and weed is likely just the path they chose to get there.
 
Well since legalizing in Co there has been a huge increase in:

Deaths while high(mostly driving)
If you watch the video I posted on page 1, he talks about the rate of fatal car crashes increasing bc of weed a little around the 20:15 mark.
 
MJ has taken the motivation of a lot of people and caused them to underachieve. I could give you names of people I know personally, but that wouldn't matter. We all know people who fall into that category.

That being said, I'm a firm believer in letting people do what they want, provided they aren't harming anyone else in the process, and provided that they have to live with the results of their bad decisions without me or anyone else bailing them out. Smoke (or drink) to your heart's content, but don't ask me to send you money to pay your living expenses through tax dollars.
Agreed but I think this goes for people even without partaking in smoking or drinking. Just don’t be a bum. I agree that some folks probably don’t live up to their potential bc they like the chronic but same can be said about anything anyone indulges in. Too much of anything is never good unless it’s greenwood. I just think two things will be a huge benefit. It really does help some folks with extreme cases of mental irregularities (using irregularities bc of all the mental health stereotypes when it could be as easy as extreme OCD or ADHD) and also just tax the hell out of it. Use it as a driver/enabler to help with some of this economic crisis we’re in the middle of, why not. Glad #2 failed as many have said, so maybe a solid option will be brought forth next time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirkPiggler
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT