ADVERTISEMENT

Hoops NCAA adjusts NET Formula

The NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball Committee announced that beginning with the 2020-21 season, the NCAA Evaluation Tool will be changed to increase accuracy and simplify it by reducing a five-component metric to just two. The remaining factors include the Team Value Index (TVI), which is a result-based feature that rewards teams for beating quality opponents, particularly away from home, as well as an adjusted net efficiency rating.

The adjusted efficiency is a team’s net efficiency, adjusted for strength of opponent and location (home/away/neutral) across all games played. For example, a given efficiency value (net points per 100 possessions) against stronger opposition rates higher than the same efficiency against lesser opponents and having a certain efficiency on the road rates higher than the same efficiency at home.

No longer will the NET use winning percentage, adjusted winning percentage and scoring margin. The change was made after the committee consulted with Google Cloud Professional Services, which worked with the NCAA to develop the original NET.

“When we adopted the NET in 2018, we had reviewed several seasons worth of data and we insisted that we would continue to evaluate the metric,” said Dan Gavitt, the NCAA’s senior vice president of basketball. “We’ve been very satisfied with its performance thus far, but it became evident after two seasons of use that this change would be an improvement. While we will continue to monitor the metric, I don’t anticipate any additional adjustments for several years. We believe this change will result in more precision throughout the season and will be easier for our membership and the public to understand.

In addition, the overall and non-conference strength of schedule has been modernized to reflect a truer measure for how hard it is to defeat opponents. The strength of schedule is based on rating every game on a team's schedule for how hard it would be for an NCAA tournament-caliber team to win. It considers opponent strength and site of each game, assigning each game a difficulty score. Aggregating these across all games results in an overall expected win percentage versus a team's schedule, which can be ranked to get a better measure of the strength of schedule.
  • Like
Reactions: DaltonG and cfcjr50

BB Recruiting 2021 Hoops Recruiting Progress

A refresher of who remains undecided on the board:
6'6" 170 SG Jalen Ricks 4* No.112 (6/27 UOV)(UOV to Arkansas@A&M game 3/7)
6'7" 195 PF Duncan Powell 4* No.86 - (UOV 9/14)(Committed to Ark 9/26)(UOV 1/18)(Decommitted 4/8)
6’6” 205 SF Harrison Ingram 5* No.13 - (UOV 8/22)(OV Scheduled for Jan 17-19-postponed)
6'4" 175 G Trey Alexander 4* No.54 - (UOV 8/20)(UOV 10/5)(Virtual UOV 4/27)
6’8” 180 C Daimion Collins 4* No.22 - (UOV 10/5)(Virtual UOV 4/25)
6'4" 165 PG Hunter Sallis 4* No.20 - (Virtual UOV 4/23)
6'4" 185 SG Langston Love 4* No.39 - (Virtual UOV 4/23)(Virtual UOV 5/5)
6'7" 195 SG Kendall Brown 5* No.14 - (Virtual UOV 4/24)(Virtual UOV 5/5)
6’6” 180 SG Matthew Cleveland 4* No.40 - (Virtual UOV 4/26)
6'11" 205 PF Alex Tchikou 4* No.25 - (Virtual UOV 4/30)
6'6" 175 SF Peyton Watson 5* No.19 - (Virtual UOV 4/17)(Virtual UOV 4/22)
6'5" 190 SF Michael James 4* No.74 - (Virtual UOV 4/27)(Virtual UOV 5/5)
6'8" 195 PF DaRon Holmes 4* No.33 - (Virtual UOV 4/30)(Virtual UOV 5/5)
6'3" 180 PG JD Davison 4* No.26 - (Virtual UOV 5/4)
6’9” 190 PF Moussa Diabate 5* No.18
6'8" 180 SF Kaleb Washington 3* No.105
6'9" 220 F Michael Foster 5* No.9
7'0" 190 C Chet Holmgren 5* No.4
6'10" 205 PF Zach Clemence 4* No.31

There are 19 prospects left undecided and since the Hogs have started doubling up on virtual visits, it appears to me that they don't have much reciprocated interest from the five prospects at the bottom of the board.

Jalen Ricks is obviously the former in-state kid who plays at Oak Hill. We haven't heard of much recruiting activity between the two parties, indicating to me that the interest into too high on Arkansas's side at this point–doesn't mean they can't start recruiting him hard some time.

The momentum with Harrison Ingram seems to have slowed despite his connections to the staff. Stanford had the buzz last month but national analyst Corey Evans says Purdue is after him the hardest at the moment.

Duncan Powell has picked up offers of little consequence since his decommitment from Arkansas–Old Dominion, Tulsa, Murray St, UTSA, Tenn Tech, Texas Southern, NC A&T.

Of the remaining 11, only two have visited campus–OKC native Trey Alexander and East Texas native Daimion Collins, a borderline 5-star. Trey's visited twice and they've both had supplemental virtual visits.

Tchikou, Watson, James, Holmes and Davison are all offers that went out between the end of March and now.

I could be wrong of course but I don't foresee any of these kids making a decision during this time but they're laying down great groundwork for when visits are allowed again and they're in the mix for a lot of talent for the ~3 spots they'll have open.

FB Recruiting Spring Visitors

This list isn't exhaustive but here are some prospects who have said they want to visit this spring:
February 1
RB James Jointer
OL Terry Wells
TE Erin Outley
OLB Corey Platt Jr
LB Cole Joyce
ATH Isaac Thompson
QB Austin Ledbetter
LB Jordan Hanna
OT Andrew Chamblee
RB Javion Hunt
WR Jaedon Wilson

QB Kaidon Salter - March 2 (visit recap)

Offered
WR Ketron Jackson - March 7 (visit recap)
DB Keuan Parker - March 7
OL Cole Carson - March 7 (visit recap)
LB DJ Arkansas - March 7 (visit recap)
RB Caleb Berry - March 7
LB Jermaine Hamilton-Jordan - March 7 (visit recap)
LB Michael Lunz - March 7
DE Javon Nelson - March 7
DB Hunter Washington - March 7
QB/DB Gentry Williams (2022) - March 7
Not Offered
DL Torey Phillips (not reoffered yet) - March 7
DT Melvin Swindle (no offer) - March 7 (visit recap)
K/P Brock Funk (no offer) - March 7
DB Kaleb+Kyle Knox (no offer) - March 7
TE Mason Brotherton (no offer) - March 7 (visit recap)
K/P Cameron Little (no offer) - March 7
K/P Kade Hensley (no offer) - March 7
LB Dwayne Johnson (no offer) - March 7
OL Dalton Brown (no offer) - March 7
DE Silas Barr (no offer) - March 7
QB Jordan Moore (no offer) - March 7
DT Kevin Greene (no offer) - March 7
DL Jack Arnette (no offer) - March 7
DB AJ Moss (no offer) - March 7
OL Brock Burns (no offer - 2022) - March 7
QB Jordan Mills (no offer - 2022) - March 7
Scratches
WR Roderick Daniels - March 7 (scratch due to 7on7)
LB Collin Oliver - March 7 (scratch, went to Texas Tech)

OL Jake Slaughter - March 16
DL Tobechi Okoli - March 16
TE Ryan Hoerstkamp - March 16

Spring Game
QB Kyron Drones - April 25
DE/TE Landyn Watson - April 25

TE Erin Outley
WR Demetrius Cannon
WR Tyrese Johnson
DL Tyas Martin
TE Errington McRae
DB Tyler Hibbler
DL Travion Ford
QB Garrett Nussmeier
OL Makalyn Pounders
OL/DL Cameron Ball
WR Erick Smith Jr (no offer)
RB Cam'Ron Valdez

FB Recruiting Analysis: Oklahoma's top 2021 prospect, Javion Hunt, commits to Arkansas

Arkansas has remained red-hot in the Sooner State over the past 24 hours, landing its second commitment from an Oklahoma prospect. This time, it's three-star ATH Javion Hunt out of Midwest City (Okla.) Carl Albert High School. Hunt is currently the top prospect in the state. He follows fellow three-star Keaun Parker in the Razorbacks' 2021 class.

Login to view embedded media
Hunt, a 6-foot-205 pound athlete, projects as a running back at the next level. Arkansas' Jimmy Smith led the charge for the Oklahoma native, who picked the Hogs over Memphis, Nebraska, Baylor, Iowa State, Texas Tech, Virginia Tech and Minnesota.

Arkansas offered Hunt in May of 2019 under Chad Morris' staff and was offered while on The Hill for an unofficial visit. Hunt returned to Fayetteville, Ark., earlier this spring before the CoVid-19-inflicted stay-at-home orders, which loomed very large toward his decision made today.

Hunt is the son of former Sooners RB Jay Hunt, who was a highly recruited prospect in his own right.

Last season, Hunt battled some regular-season injuries, but still managed 1,114 yards on 160 carries and 25 touchdowns. That equates to nearly 7 yards per carry. He also caught 12 passes for 135 yards and a touch. While playing some quarterback, Hunt also threw two TD on two passing attempts.

Hunt was clocked with a 12.07-second 100-meter in 2018. That's the only verified track time for the running back, but upon film review he appears to have improved in that area. Hunt also has track times of 1:00:38 seconds in the 400-meter and 18.19 seconds in the 110-meter hurdles as a dual-sport athlete.

On film, Hunt is a powerful, physical runner that thrives at making sharp cuts and keeping defenders off-balance, then bull-dozing his way forward. Hunt invites contact, routinely runs through would-be tacklers and has a nose for the end zone. While his 100-meter time was unimpressive, Hunt shows the ability to race to the edge and break runs outside.

Hunt is difficult to bring down and has excellent vision. He sees his blockers and holes opening up before they actually open, which allows for big-play potential. Hunt mustered a good chunk of those as a junior last fall. He has some elusiveness and twitch in the open field, but seemingly prefers to run through defenders and try to mow them over.

Hunt also sees some action as a safety. He played largely in the box and is a physical defender, which could have been expected based on his tape at running back. He has quick feet and is very nimble on them, which says a lot for a back that measures in at 6-foot and 205 or so pounds.

Hunt is a threat in-between the tackles that can bounce runs outside. He has great balance and is able to absorb contact and keep his legs churning and moving forward. He's a threat to catch passes out of the backfield. He has great hands and has reeled in passes over the middle with defenders in his face.

Hunt is an ideal fit in a Sam Pittman-inspired offense with physical blockers up front and a powerful running back getting plenty of snaps. He'll be a part of a power running game with the potential for splash plays downfield on a broken run or even a catch out of the backfield.

Shops

I am about to build a shop. Starting the process of getting bids on the shop/clearing land etc now. Looking at building a 30x30x11 shop with a 12x30 lean-to. One walk in door, probably 4 windows. And probably 2 10x10 automatic doors.

Anyone had a shop built? Recommend anyone good? I live in hot springs. I’d love to use someone who can do concrete etc with the shop if possible instead of subcontracting several people out.

Congratulations! You’re in Year Negative One

The coaching jobs that deserve a little bit more patience from the start

  • By [URL='https://www.bannersociety.com/authors/steven-godfrey']Steven Godfrey
  • on May 7, 2020 3:02 pm
A few years ago on “Podcast Ain’t Played Nobody,” Bill Connelly and I started playing with the idea of linear time. Specifically, we were arguing that some programs with first-year coaching staffs needed a designation that would beg fans and boosters (and critics at large) for a greater patience than the usual concessions granted a team in “Year One.”

“Year Zero” was born out of the accepted idea that not all first seasons are remotely equal. Yet it’s hard to tack down a single metric that explains why. Maybe your new staff faces a ridiculous schedule in a particularly deep conference or division. Maybe your program has been historically underfunded and had no recruiting success. Maybe your roster was decimated via NCAA probation, or by hiring Bobby Petrino.
[/URL]
https://www.bannersociety.com/platf...coach-hire-hot-seat?__twitter_impression=true
  • Like
Reactions: GiveEmtheTusk
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT