Are you freaking kidding me?
Please tell me you’re trolling at this point and I promise I’ll say that you owned me and laugh about it
OT 100% NOT the Official Off-Topic/Politics/Corona Thread
- Thread starter portlandhog
- Start date
Please tell me you’re trolling at this point and I promise I’ll say that you owned me and laugh about it
But can anyone cite that data? If I posted it, I’d be able to back it up. I can post tweets refuting it, but I won’t because I don’t have the data to back it up.
the dude gets jacked up on pain pills and weed every now and then and this is what you get......................
- May 11, 2002
- 34,288
- 33,965
- 113
I didn't find anything. I'd wonder, like you, where they got the numbers from.
I’m not going to go into all of it but it does matter, there have been multiple races decided by voter fraud that ended up overturned.
care to link any above county level?
SouthTulsa: Here’s a tweet.
Me: Where did the data in that tweet come from? That appears to be a random person on twitter posting info from Reddit.
NM: It came from this tweet (the original tweet posted). If you click on it, there’s a Reddit thread.
OMG.
It leads to the CDC site. If you can’t follow it from there you are hopeless. Is that you Donald?
Have your granddaughter that’s smarter than me find it for you.
Why post a tweet and tell me to find one of the responses and it will lead me to a series of links, one of which will have that info. If you’ve seen it, why not just share the link?
I’ve posted 10,000 links for people and I’m sure you’ve read many of them. I can’t imagine posting something and being a dick and telling people to go search for it themselves.
I’m actually perfectly fine conceding this to be true. It just would be nice to see actual data.
I’m still trying to figure out your point. At first you said voter fraud was a problem, it’s not. There have been hundreds of studies that prove that. Does it happen? Yes. Does it happen on a large enough scale to influence a state or federal election? No.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/debunking-voter-fraud-myth
"A comprehensive 2014 study published in The Washington Post found 31 credible instances of impersonation fraud from 2000 to 2014, out of more than 1 billion ballots cast."
You then posted a tweet stating he had to vote absentee, but I posted showing he was in the damn city that he claims to live in during early voting but he chose to golf instead. He was there for the entire weekend.
The difference between you and me is I don't care about "owning" anyone. If you can't see the clear facts I present to you, I don't know what else I can do.
Also, to make things even funnier, here's is the polling place he could've gone to. IT'S ACROSS THE DAMN STREET FROM HIS GOLF CLUB.
Absentee ballot my ass. Dude is a lazy moron. The dumbass could've filled out a ballot and walked across the freaking street.
Last edited:
And you still don’t understand. Smh. Good work though.
I see you have no answer to the facts I presented. It's okay. I've asked you several times to clarify what your point is.
At this point I don't think you even have one.
Trump and Barbie Press Secretary lied. The end.
Here is my first reply to you. It doesn’t say a word about voter fraud from me.
This should he really simple but you constantly try and add to my original reply.
Again, as has been explained many times to you.
Trumps administration doesn’t care about people sending in ballots that REQUESTED to vote by mail.
The Dems are sending out millions of ballots to people that haven’t requested them. I’m not certain on this but I’m pretty sure it’s against the law to send ballots to people that haven’t requested.
Fine. You definitely aren't certain. Sending out ballots automatically is determined by each individual state. Some states allow it, some don't.
The Federal government has no control over how a State decides it wants to run their voting method.
Also, several Republican states have recently started sending out applications to all residents. It's not just a Democrat idea.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-democrats-republicans-move-ahead/5235610002/
As I have answered your original reply, let's move on.
I’m good to move on, this has been crazy. I honestly thought you were trolling me.
There was never really a question from me. I simply pointed out your article and gotcha trump moment was false.
https://nationalpost.com/news/world...loroquine-while-public-is-warned-away-from-it. Y’all know I’ve been away snsip!
Now our morbidly obese president is going full dictator tots.
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/business-52815872
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/business-52815872
- May 11, 2002
- 34,288
- 33,965
- 113
Complains about censorship and stifling free speech.
Wants to shut down platforms for free speech.
Here's the statement from Twitter CEO:
"
Fact check: there is someone ultimately accountable for our actions as a company, and that’s me. Please leave our employees out of this. We’ll continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally. And we will admit to and own any mistakes we make.
This does not make us an “arbiter of truth.” Our intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and show the information in dispute so people can judge for themselves. More transparency from us is critical so folks can clearly see the why behind our actions.
Per our Civic Integrity policy, the tweets yesterday may mislead people into thinking they don’t need to register to get a ballot (only registered voters receive ballots). We’re updating the link on @realDonaldTrump’s tweet to make this more clear."
/endquote
I kinda thought conservatives wanted less government? Donald Trump is like "nu uh, I'll use my big bad government powers to shut up those who oppose me!"
Bullshit he wants an even playing field.. if libtards can get on Twitter and spout lies about him without getting fact checked but he is getting fact checked left and right
Last edited:
Silence and censor the conservative but push the liberal rhetoric.... media bullshit
Fact checking should not be limited to only social media. Unless it’s deemed an opinion pierce, ALL media should be fact checked.
The egregious shit that goes on is a threat to the American democracy and IMO, the main culprit of the divisiveness today.
The egregious shit that goes on is a threat to the American democracy and IMO, the main culprit of the divisiveness today.
They call it fact checking, but its not. Its censoring. Only allowing one viewpoint and silencing the other is not fact checking at all
Agree fervently with the last line. We basically are making enemies of strangers for clicks and sponsors. Twitter was a fantastic idea that became an abomination with sponsorship, robot users, and news agencies skirting libelous statements with the almighty, "source."
I detest twitter, but signing an executive order aimed at social media because he got his feelings hurt is pathetic. Whatever the order says will ultimately not be upheld in court.
Hey don't try and explain anything to the 6 liberals and it's fearless leader on this board they are just like the others , feet are stuck in cement no matter what good the President does they ain't moving just a bunch of haters.
Publisher or platform, finally time for these
es to decide. And I would be upset too if Yoel Roth was going to fact check me and not Joe Biden.
Apologies, what rights are being taken away? Additionally, what actions have been done to make him have "total power over a country, typically one who has obtained control by force?"
Thanks in advance.
He is literally trying to pass an executive order that would force people to not exercise free speech within their own business lol.
Agree. It’s easy to spew hate and become divisive when you reduce someone to words behind a screen rather than an actual person
The crooked FBI and Democrats changed the entire playing field when Trump was elected and have went on a spree of nonstop illegal activities trying to get rid him.Publisher or platform, finally time for these
Spending millions of dollars and come up empty each time.
Nancy Pelosi is poison as is the rest.
Mike.... I've tried to follow up to find the numbers but it's a confusing mess. I retract the 918 number because I can't confirm. It looks to me like they averaged about 3000 deaths per year due to pneumonia. That's still way below the 5,000+ in the first five months of this year though.
You can find those numbers through here: https://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html
So, there's nothing wrong with me calling the tweet false and criticizing the use of a random tweet with reddit as a backup source?
Also, wtf is he going to do about it if they continue to fact check him? Shut them down? That would be horrible for the economy and his re-election considering all the business that runs off SM. Also it’s the biggest platform for spreading right wing fake news that so many of you believe.
