It's not "inaccurate info" it's the info they have at the time. You only get more accurate as more data comes in–that takes time. So instead of endangering a ton of people, you take the cautious route until you have a clear picture of what the situation really is.
Deficit spending is brand new since trump took over huh? I follow fakenews https://markets.businessinsider.com...-obama-bush-administrations-2019-9-1028833119
Yeah, that makes no sense.
Well that was the dumbest use of an example i've ever seen.
I don’t think your response is going to accomplish what your hoping it will. He said it’s not that bad if you are under 65, not that you can’t get the virus if you are under 65. Unless the death rate percentage drastically increases in cases of people under 65 then I think his point still stands.
So rather than refuting it, like an intelligent person, you just say, "It's dumb."
Personal attack, that's new.
Actually it is. It's literally a math problem: In the susceptibility model, the basic reproductive number is R0 = βN/α, the mean generation time is Tg = 1/α, and the epidemic growth rate is r = (R0−1)/Tg.
So you think the variables they plug in on Day 1 are the same on Day 100?
No...they received new info....
Ok so yes, they were wrong, by your standards. But it's impossible to be correct. They did the best calculation they could have with the data available. it's all you can do, it doesn't guarantee correctness. Nobody knows the answer. we still don't. it's still changing.
and? Those are numbers. Big deal. I'm talking about the severity of having it.
For oulde like yourself, you may die. If you were a bull ox like myself, well hell, I might have already had it and not known it. Hope this finds you well.
So I guess all of the times you commented on how Trump hasn't done enough or whatever he's done I could have used, "It's impossible to be correct?"
Not really two comparable situations, but sure, if you'd like
So I guess all of the times you commented on how Trump hasn't done enough or whatever he's done I could have used, "It's impossible to be correct?"
Then why have them? You're always griping about the pandemic team being disbanded, blah blah blah but in the same breath you say that it's impossible for them to be correct.
You said this about two months too early
Ha ha hypocrite. You called me a DICK and now you're crying about personal attacks. Learn to take it if you're going to dish it out little lady.
One group makes educated decisions based upon the information they've gathered: "can't be mad if they get it wrong."
To do the best they can!! Is your argument really that we should do nothing versus try the best we can?? Of course it's not, you're just trolling me like you always do
who said otherwise? I think you're talking to yourself there chief.
I will always listen to you chief. You're good people. I may not buy what you're selling but I'll listen!
Trump not wearing a mask to set a good example for the American people - totally wrong.
but what a way to go......................am i right?Lol.... Everybody has to go at some point. It's all predetermined anyway. Smoke camel no filters from the age of 11 until you're 80 like my grandpa and live to be 84 and at the same time some marathon runner drops dead at the age of 35 with 4% body fat. WTF. Go live.
