This may or may not work.drop links
Let's go! 1.5 hours of valuable excel training.This may or may not work.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/56qzcvztazgcdg3/Excel Training.mp4?dl=0
Edit: worked for me but that me just be because I uploaded it.
So it worked. Awesome. I've opened up the flood gates for people making fun of me. Oh well.Let's go! 1.5 hours of valuable excel training.
This just goes to show everyone, the Bert is an invaluable resource.
What the hell would they make fun of you for? Also, was this a live training session? I think I hear you answering someone's questionSo it worked. Awesome. I've opened up the flood gates for people making fun of me. Oh well.
Yep. I was recording my screen while presenting.What the hell would they make fun of you for? Also, was this a live training session? I think I hear you answering someone's question
I do that nearly every day for my job and I'm glad there aren't cameras around recording it hahaYep. I was recording my screen while presenting.
Never agree on what, that Flynn didn’t lie?You and I will never agree on this. I know by now I’m not changing your mind on anything and you certainly aren’t changing mine on this.
A data company, Surgisphere, supposedly compiled all of the research for HCl from many different countries.
People saw some of the data, specifically the Australian data and said, "that makes no sense."
Someone approached the company about the issue and they went, "oops." And changed the data to "Asia."
Problem is, people in Australia never talked to these guys. I get what you're saying @mcbmd, but there's literally no way around this. They made up data to support a narrative they wanted: Trump wrong. Otherwise, why would you create data that is positive? I'd understand if you just threw in a few thousand false negatives to show that your study was "robust," but to do so in the false positive says you have malicious intent.
Not sure how you can argue that isn't true.
Never agree on what, that Flynn didn’t lie?
i guess the interviewing agents also created a alternate reality lol. Facts be damn! https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ess-fbi-agents-didnt-think-michael-flynn-lied.Look man, if you want to create your reality and live in it, go for it.
i guess the interviewing agents also created a alternate reality lol. Facts be damn! https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ess-fbi-agents-didnt-think-michael-flynn-lied.
i guess the interviewing agents also created a alternate reality lol. Facts be damn! https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ess-fbi-agents-didnt-think-michael-flynn-lied.
How do you interpret that as bad?“They’re gonna dismiss some number of Russians out of the country, I understand all that and I understand that,” Mr. Flynn said. “But what I would ask Russia to do is to not—is—is—if anything—because I know you have to have some sort of action—to, to only make it reciprocal. Make it reciprocal. Don’t—don’t make it—don’t go any further than you have to. Because I don’t want us to get into something that has to escalate, on a, you know, on a tit for tat. You follow me, Ambassador?”
How do you interpret that as bad?
I read it as him saying just to hold off retaliation on the US so they can deal with it. This is 3 weeks before they take office.
Maybe I’m reading it wrong but that’s how I see it.
As with most things political, we all interpret things differently. In reading it(imo), Flynn knows Russia has to respond in some way(there’s more context to that than your quote)and is going to. He asked them not to go crazy with it. Seems reasonable to me and it’s also not really discussing sanctions imo. There’s not any in-depth discussion there. Just a simple hold off while they transition into office and so they don’t immediately start off going at each other’s throats.I see it as him undermining sanctions placed on Russia for their election interference (which has bipartisan acknowledgment) by telling them to respond reciprocally, which is him encouraging some level of retaliation against America. It also plays as a (when we take office, this will all go away) type of thing.
This BS about the interviewers not thinking he lied is also misleading. The interviews who were monitoring is body language based on that they didn’t think he knowingly lied. The guys a general, likely knows how to lie. They also confirmed that his answers were inconsistent with what was said. Which they were.
Yet I’m told Flynn is a hero and I should disregard Mattis because he is suddenly a deep state puppet based on some stupidity about him not coming out in support of Flynn.
I also provided an article about how Mattis presided over another investigation of Flynn back around 2012 or 2013 that was initiated by other generals at the time, not Mattis.
In retaliation, Flynn tried to cross Mattis’ name off the list of SecDef candidates.
As with most things political, we all interpret things differently. In reading it(imo), Flynn knows Russia has to respond in some way(there’s more context to that than your quote)and is going to. He asked them not to go crazy with it. Seems reasonable to me and it’s also not really discussing sanctions imo. There’s not any in-depth discussion there. Just a simple hold off while they transition into office and so they don’t immediately start off going at each other’s throats.
Sure seems to be some gate between Mattis and Flynn. I’m not going to bash Mattis because I know nothing, but he has been fired bye both Obama and Trump now, I would guess there’s some legitimate reasons, and the same can be said for Flynn.
Weird how Trump doesn’t mention he was his lawyer.
very good read here.
very good read here.
But then again, “my lawyer wrote this really good thing about me and definitely doesn’t have any conflicts of interest” probably doesn’t mislead people quite as well.Weird how Trump doesn’t mention he was his lawyer.
very good read here.
I’ve got to get up in 5 hours so last post. We simply disagree. I don’t see how that can be considered a negotiation, it’s not even close imo, it’s a simple ask to hold off until they get in office and figure things out.It should also be noted that Flynn did not yet have authorization to negotiate on that level.
As far as Mattis being fired by Obama, or resigning, it is simply due to butting heads. Nothing nefarious.
https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2020/06/...-james-mattis-donald-trump-tweet-twitter/?amp
He referred to protestors as terrorists, used the term snowflake, referred to local government wetting itself, and of course went into anti Obama tirade toward the end because “what about Obama!” is somehow always the go to.
There’s also the conflict of interest part.
And now Trumps supporters are filling that twitter timeline with asinine conspiracy theories about Mattis that this letter encourages.
For all of the eloquence of the Mattis letter, this has none.
An estimated 1833 people died in Hurricane Katrina, it was not an instance where it was about protests. The Army’s mission in NOLA was a rescue mission first, save the city from the natural disaster and as a result they had to patrol the streets.
https://www.army.mil/article-amp/45029/the_army_response_to_hurricane_katrina
Why you quoting me on this point, Kanye?
I was adding to what you said...and future was going to bed.
I was adding to what you said...and future was going to bed.
he was fired by neither, He retired in 2013, and resigned as SECDEF, Mattis has more honor than Trump could have in a thousand lifetimes.As with most things political, we all interpret things differently. In reading it(imo), Flynn knows Russia has to respond in some way(there’s more context to that than your quote)and is going to. He asked them not to go crazy with it. Seems reasonable to me and it’s also not really discussing sanctions imo. There’s not any in-depth discussion there. Just a simple hold off while they transition into office and so they don’t immediately start off going at each other’s throats.
Sure seems to be some gate between Mattis and Flynn. I’m not going to bash Mattis because I know nothing, but he has been fired bye both Obama and Trump now, I would guess there’s some legitimate reasons, and the same can be said for Flynn.
Here's some more of thosepeaceful protestersterrorists Trump is talking about...
Two of the officers have been suspended without pay.
Technically you’re right, he resigned, But as with most cases people are allowed to resign out of respect. There’s stories that Obama replaces him and didn’t even give a phone call letting him know.he was fired by neither, He retired in 2013, and resigned as SECDEF, Mattis has more honor than Trump could have in a thousand lifetimes.
he's talking about Bush Sr. using the Marines in Los Angleles back in '92, not Jr. and Louisiana. Too many like names and abbreviations.An estimated 1833 people died in Hurricane Katrina, it was not an instance where it was about protests. The Army’s mission in NOLA was a rescue mission first, save the city from the natural disaster and as a result they had to patrol the streets.
https://www.army.mil/article-amp/45029/the_army_response_to_hurricane_katrina
But he did lie. They released the phone recording Minny. He discussed what he said it did not discuss. He also told the Russians to retaliate against America...borderline treason. You can have Flynn, I’ll take Mattis. Trump really could go out in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot someone random, you’d be like “it was a deep state lib.....”
lol okay! Is there illegal activity going on there or something? lol So when the interviewing agents, Comey, McCabe all say they don’t think he lied when he was asked about this perfectly legal conversation, I’m not supposed to believe them? lol But I’m supposed to believe you, Andrew Weismann and Mueller, who claims he doesn’t even know what the dossier is? I got ocean front property in Wisconsin I’ll sell ya. Talk about alternative facts“They’re gonna dismiss some number of Russians out of the country, I understand all that and I understand that,” Mr. Flynn said. “But what I would ask Russia to do is to not—is—is—if anything—because I know you have to have some sort of action—to, to only make it reciprocal. Make it reciprocal. Don’t—don’t make it—don’t go any further than you have to. Because I don’t want us to get into something that has to escalate, on a, you know, on a tit for tat. You follow me, Ambassador?”
the dem shutdown. The ends will justify the means tho. Whatever to get rid of trump. Cause dementia Joe can fix this lol4 more years