This, to me, is the part that I think is upsetting people the most.Originally posted by mtsuhog85:
Most know its not officially freedom of speech, but if you say something that is not PC you could get canned.Originally posted by ksmathis:
You guys who are confusing the freedom of speech with the right to voice their opinions free from judgment of their employer are a little dramatic. His employer suspended him for voicing an opinion that they do not want associated with them which is well within their rights. Phil Robertson did not get locked up in prison and have his tongue cut out. Hopefully you guys see the difference. If not, carry on with your overreactions because they are comical.
Hence, why PR got canned. Its not in line with what the main stream media wants.
OTOH, if he was flaming gay, atheist, he could say just about anything and get away with it. Especially, if it was against a Christian.
Yeah, mtsu, can't imagine why Christians are so persecuted in this PC world.Originally posted by mtsuhog85:
If DD did tell them to shove it, A&E will go out and find a show with two fags, a black, and chinesse girl to fit their mold.
PC is set to finish this country off.
What's comical is the way A&E as well as most mainstream media have no problems telling us all what to accept, what to celebrate, where the moral boundaries are(and aren't), who deserves special treatment, who deserves to be stifled, and who deserves to be slammed, all in the name of tolerance and diversity...... As long as they agree with them. Let somebody's diverse beliefs run afoul of theirs and the tolerance quickly disappears. I seldom watch Duck Dynasty but when I have it appears to be one of the least offensive and least immoral shows on TV. You act as if the guy was flailing the q and the f word around and threatening gays with their lives. He wasn't. He simply answered a question honestly according to his faith. and had to be punished for it. Hopefully you guys see the difference.Originally posted by ksmathis:
You guys who are confusing the freedom of speech with the right to voice their opinions free from judgment of their employer are a little dramatic. His employer suspended him for voicing an opinion that they do not want associated with them which is well within their rights. Phil Robertson did not get locked up in prison and have his tongue cut out. Hopefully you guys see the difference. If not, carry on with your overreactions because they are comical.
What you are saying is the bible is antiquated, because that's what he was quoting. I realize a lot of people believe that way these days.Originally posted by B0b L0blaw:
That antiquated view of homosexuality is bad for business.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Tying homosexuality with bestiality is very antiquated. I'm not even bringing up the Nazi, Islamic, Pearl Harbor stuff. The problem with his view is that gays/lesbians are being denied rights that heterosexual married couples are entitled to. The view he supports is a centerpiece of the argument against marriage equality. Over 75% of the US is Christian, they're not a persecuted minority. Having to be tolerant and considerate of different groups isn't persecution or loss of freedom. It's part of living in our society, a free society.Originally posted by titanhawg:
What you are saying is the bible is antiquated, because that's what he was quoting. I realize a lot of people believe that way these days.Originally posted by B0b L0blaw:
That antiquated view of homosexuality is bad for business.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Wow, such a novel idea! Guess what? I DON'T watch it because it is not funny nor is it entertaining.Originally posted by Woodlands_Hog:
Here is an idea. Just don't watch it!
So, you draw the line at beastiality? What gives you that right? Who are you to say gays should get married but if a guy is in love with his sheep he has no right to do what is natural to him and makes him happy? And brothers and sisters, fathers and daughters, sons and moms, they already love each other after all, men and little boys, who are you to tell them they can't express their love through marriage?Originally posted by B0b L0blaw:
Tying homosexuality with bestiality is very antiquated. I'm not even bringing up the Nazi, Islamic, Pearl Harbor stuff. The problem with his view is that gays/lesbians are being denied rights that heterosexual married couples are entitled to. The view he supports is a centerpiece of the argument against marriage equality. Over 75% of the US is Christian, they're not a persecuted minority. Having to be tolerant and considerate of different groups isn't persecution or loss of freedom. It's part of living in our society, a free society.Originally posted by titanhawg:
What you are saying is the bible is antiquated, because that's what he was quoting. I realize a lot of people believe that way these days.Originally posted by B0b L0blaw:
That antiquated view of homosexuality is bad for business.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Originally posted by Cptcaveman56:
So sick of the homo love in this country, they have so many more rights than Christians.
Wow, you really believe that????Originally posted by rzrbk7777:
Nobody is preventing gays from being gay, denying jobs, housing, or the right to go through life as they see fit, but once you open the door to treating them like they are a traditional mom and dad you open a door for every other alternative lifestyle to make the same claim. Are you ready to remove all lines? Once you move the line you can expect someone else to want to move it again and they will have all the same arguments the gays use.
Actually...I haven't seen his remarks about being a Nazi...or Islam...or Pearl Harbor...but quoting scripture that lists sins that will keep someone out of Heaven according to those who believe in the Christian bible when he was asked his thoughts on homosexuality makes perfect sense. He was obviously trying to say there are tons of sins that will keep someone out of Heaven...and homosexuality is one in that number. Just because someone took offense that beastiality is in there doesn't mean he's saying homosexuality=beastiality. The bible also says liars won't inherit Heaven.Originally posted by B0b L0blaw:
Tying homosexuality with bestiality is very antiquated. I'm not even bringing up the Nazi, Islamic, Pearl Harbor stuff. The problem with his view is that gays/lesbians are being denied rights that heterosexual married couples are entitled to. The view he supports is a centerpiece of the argument against marriage equality. Over 75% of the US is Christian, they're not a persecuted minority. Having to be tolerant and considerate of different groups isn't persecution or loss of freedom. It's part of living in our society, a free society.Originally posted by titanhawg:
What you are saying is the bible is antiquated, because that's what he was quoting. I realize a lot of people believe that way these days.Originally posted by B0b L0blaw:
That antiquated view of homosexuality is bad for business.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Not sure if serious.Originally posted by Cptcaveman56:
So sick of the homo love in this country, they have so many more rights than Christians.
Which in it itself a double standard on the tv channles part.Originally posted by ksmathis:
You guys who are confusing the freedom of speech with the right to voice their opinions free from judgment of their employer are a little dramatic. His employer suspended him for voicing an opinion that they do not want associated with them which is well within their rights. Phil Robertson did not get locked up in prison and have his tongue cut out. Hopefully you guys see the difference. If not, carry on with your overreactions because they are comical.
Well, yes. It is a business.Originally posted by hogger42:
Looks to me A n E is perfectly fine profiting off of the show until they catch a little heat from a small faction of society.
I don't understand why people are just focusing on the homosexual comments when the above quote basically says that 99.9% of his viewers will not get into Heaven.Originally posted by ClearLakeHog-2:
"Don't be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers?they won't inherit the kingdom of God. Don't deceive yourself. It's not right."
Originally posted by YoHogbo:
I don't understand why people are just focusing on the homosexual comments when the above quote basically says that 99.9% of his viewers will not get into Heaven.Originally posted by ClearLakeHog-2:
"Don't be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers?they won't inherit the kingdom of God. Don't deceive yourself. It's not right."
I would guess the no idolatry rule of the bible alone would eliminate a majority of "Christians" from going to Heaven. Almost every Christian I know has either a cross on their necklace or a picture of Jesus or some other form of idol worship.
What are the odds that Phil owns some form of idolatry himself and is therefore a hypocrite?
This whole argument is entertaining. But please inform me how I am promoting socialist policies? I realize many think supporting a democrat is socialist and many think supporting a republican is nazi, but neither offer legitimate debate about todays issues in todays world. It's just nonsense vitriol.Originally posted by grobertson:
The man has the right to voice his opinions -- his employer has a right to set standards and hold him to them. My issue is with the homosexual communities fixation on liberal/socialist politics. I wish they would stick to human rights issues.
I like what a man said over 100 years ago about sex .... "what people do IN PRIVATE is not of my concern, as long as it does not abuse horses or cause a rise in the cost of whiskey". (my emphasis)