And you think USPS is exempt why?Why do you think USPS is exempt from this executive order and what characteristics of leadership are shown in this exemption?
And you think USPS is exempt why?Why do you think USPS is exempt from this executive order and what characteristics of leadership are shown in this exemption?
Multiple reports last night but now a Washington Post reporter has corrected her claims and are now reported as not exempt. I concede my previous question.And you think USPS is exempt why?
“Other side?” Do you mean the pro-virus pro-death crowd?Multiple reports last night but now a Washington Post reporter has corrected her claims and are now reported as not exempt. I concede my previous question.
Congratulations on your authoritarian victory. I hope you share the same passion when the other side is in control and abuses their power in the same manner.
Lets say your friend the Tangerine Treasonweasel.“Other side?” Do you mean the pro-virus pro-death crowd?
Stablegenius McShitforbrains?Lets say your friend the Tangerine Treasonweasel.
However you refer to him. Funny how those epithets could allude to our current POTUS, as well.Stablegenius McShitforbrains?
Squirrelwig McRacistpants?
The Orange Astroid of Awfulness?However you refer to him. Funny how those epithets could allude to our current POTUS, as well.
Okay, then. You do realize he could be in office again and could use this unprecedented federal abuse of power?The Orange Astroid of Awfulness?
Babyhands McCheetodick?
See, what if you two had been seated together at the ball game.
------
Howard Stern Says Anti-Vaxxers Should Be Denied Hospital Care Once Infected
The shock jock also mocked conservative radio hosts who pushed back against the vaccines before dying of the virus.
Do you feel the same way about drunk drivers, themselves, when they are killed?I'm very much anti government mandate. Especially for private businesses with over 100 employees.
This whole thing is a problem of politics, terrible messaging and the dangers of social media. Kudos to those that could see past all that.
I have no problem with what Stern said. Those radio hosts probably convinced many to refuse the vaccine and die. But they thought it would help their ratings. Special place in hell for some of them.
What if he’s in prison? As far as “abuse of power,” bless your little heart. This is standard sh!t. We’ve had vaccine mandates for decades. Not a controversial thing.Okay, then. You do realize he could be in office again and could use this unprecedented federal abuse of power?
I would argue that Biden is violating the 10th amendment and has effectively bypassed the legislative branch. He has already violated the constitution twice, as deemed by SCOTUS, over the eviction moratorium.What if he’s in prison? As far as “abuse of power,” bless your little heart. This is standard sh!t. We’ve had vaccine mandates for decades. Not a controversial thing.
Next.
That's not apples to apples at all, but I'll answer it. If a drunk driver is involved in a wreck and kills themselves and someone else, I don't have much sympathy for the drunk driver. Do you?Do you feel the same way about drunk drivers, themselves, when they are killed?
I believe the drunk driver analogy is a close parallel. A person is choosing to do something that could harm others. In this case when referring to the Howard Stern comments, it would be the driver killing himself. In any other circumstance, when has it been okay to celebrate the death of a driver who was drunk?That's not apples to apples at all, but I'll answer it. If a drunk driver is involved in a wreck and kills themselves and someone else, I don't have much sympathy for the drunk driver. Do you?
If a guy drove drunk every day killing people along the way, then finally one day ran off the road killing himself, I'd probably mock him.I believe the drunk driver analogy is a close parallel. A person is choosing to do something that could harm others. In this case when referring to the Howard Stern comments, it would be the driver killing himself. In any other circumstance, when has it been okay to celebrate the death of a driver who was drunk?
So you are saying the speech from those broadcasters killed people? If I am referencing the analogy correctly.If a guy drove drunk every day killing people along the way, then finally one day ran off the road killing himself, I'd probably mock him.
I'd feel bad for his family and feel bad that he felt the need to put himself in that position. But he killed people and the world is probably a better place without him.
By law and by hippocratic oath, yes. But I'm sure a lot of people would say "hell no" and I don't take issue with them saying that. They also will face criminal charges after they are released.Further, if a drunk driver hits another vehicle and kills everyone inside but the drunk driver survives, should that person still be given medical treatment?
Right, but you do realize there are growing calls to not treat the unvaccinated?By law and by hippocratic oath, yes. But I'm sure a lot of people would say "hell no" and I don't take issue with them saying that. They also will face criminal charges after they are released.
Right, but you do realize there are growing calls to not treat the unvaccinated?
Controversial figure Candice Owens was denied a COVID test due to her political views.By law and by hippocratic oath, yes. But I'm sure a lot of people would say "hell no" and I don't take issue with them saying that. They also will face criminal charges after they are released.
Let's be clear here. This is your analogy, not mine. I sad it wasn't apples to apples.So you are saying the speech from those broadcasters killed people? If I am referencing the analogy correctly.
OK. Where did I say I was for that? I don't agree with what they did, but understand their frustration. Sometimes you have to swallow your pride and just do your job. That's what the clinic should've done.Controversial figure Candice Owens was denied a COVID test due to her political views.
You said that there is a special place in hell for them. What I am trying to point out is that rhetoric is moving rapidly toward the unethical treatment of human beings. I can show that with my Candice Owens example. Freedom of speech and personal autonomy shouldn't be condemnations in hell.Let's be clear here. This is your analogy, not mine. I sad it wasn't apples to apples.
My statement was:
"Those radio hosts probably convinced many to refuse the vaccine and die."
I hate that they died, but they probably contributed to others to dying in a similar manner.
I don't condemn people to hell. That's between them and their maker. And I said special place in hell for SOME of them.You said that there is a special place in hell for them. What I am trying to point out is that rhetoric is moving rapidly toward the unethical treatment of human beings. I can show that with my Candice Owens example. Freedom of speech and personal autonomy shouldn't be condemnations in hell.
Touche. Solid point. I criticize your rhetoric while you criticize theirs.I don't condemn people to hell. That's between them and their maker. I said special place in hell for SOME of them.
All I'll say is I believe a there are a lot of people in the media who have made money off being anti vaxx (yes, I know both sides have). If I was someone who knowingly spread misinformation that led to people dying because I was profiting from it, I wouldn't feel real comfortable heading into the afterlife. Feel free to disagree with that all you want.
*And i'm all for freedom of speech. Like we've always said freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequences. I'm not trying to shut down anyone's freedom of speech. But I can critique it. You seem to think my criticism is unethical treatment, lol.
My first post today:I just hope you can see the direction all of this is heading.
How would you characterize the DOJ claiming the Texas heartbeat bill as unconstitutional in reference to the vaccination mandates?My first post today:
I'm very much anti government mandate. Especially for private businesses with over 100 employees.
This whole thing is a problem of politics, terrible messaging and the dangers of social media. Kudos to those that could see past all that.
I know its a huge story but believe it or not I have not looked into it at all and do not have educated opinion.How would you characterize the DOJ claiming the Texas heartbeat bill as unconstitutional in reference to the vaccination mandates?
Appreciate it. You always bring quality opinions to the table. Been very civil. We probably are closer on these things than we know.I enjoy the discussion we are having. Please feel free to disengage at any point @mikedamone. I do appreciate it so far.
Well, the only details I know are that Kamala Harris and the DOJ are claiming that the recent Texas abortion bill violates bodily autonomy. In my opinion, the vaccine mandates do this very thing.I know its a huge story but believe it or not I have not looked into it at all and do not have educated opinion.
I think we are very close. I think our feelings on vaccinations only slightly differ and I can live with that. It's a very serious debate.Appreciate it. You always bring quality opinions to the table. Been very civil. We probably are closer on these things than we know.