Common good as in there being hospitals with beds for heart attacks major trauma etc, and I think that polio and small pox eradication are credited to vaccination. As far as feeling safe that’s on you. As long as you don’t throw a fit about being denied entry or service it doesn’t bother me.
Common good as it makes people "feel" better, which is THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THIS COUNTRY. Feelings are important, more important than reality. If it "feels" good, its right.
I brought up feelings, cause thats the root of the common good you referred to. It doesnt help much at all, the individual assumes the majority of the risk, but it doesnt make people feel good but rather makes people feel uneasy, so it must be squashed.
But feelings didn’t cure smallpox or polio don’t you consider those adding to the common good?
Comparing this vacc to one used for over 50 years is a little irresponsible, and makes me feel bad. How dare you
Wouldnt write that off as crazy, it was obviously used as a weapon here, imo. Wanna know how people will react? I dont think we showed much strength to make these people think twice about releasing another one. If a truly deadly virus gets released, the world is truly ****ed
You reckon there were people hoping the ones who were suspicious would die to prove a point? You think the ones who were suspicious were denied personal freedoms? How do you think people felt back then?
We should go die in a fire. Too complex, yet simple, for us to understand.
People hide behind their smartphone or makeup or beards (me). As for mask would ask a surgeon to not wear one?
Its a little different opening up someones body and standing over them and walking by them in walmart, dont ya think?
It wasn't a study, it was his own patients that he was treating himself. Why would a doctor "practice bad medicine to make a name for himself"? Makes no sense. Anyway, just because over half his patients had issues doesn't mean everyone will have the same experience but if someone started noticing shortness of breath, or other abnormalities after the jab it might be worth talking to their doctor.You can definitely find pockets of fringe physicians on the internet making claims like this. They are the outlier, because the actual experts on the subject realize that what they are saying is ridiculous.
His “study” was not scientific, not published and not peer reviewed, because it has obvious inherent errors in it.
An elevated d-dimer has a low specificity for blood clots. But when you do find an elevated D-dimer you get a CT scan to visually see if there is indeed clotting. And by this guys own admission, that was not found.
I suspect that a lot of these Doctors who are practicing bad medicine are doing so to try to make a name for themselves amongst these fringe societies who are looking for someone to validate beliefs that those groups already have. And so now you can say “see these doctors are skeptical, the vast majority of medical experts out there are clearly either wrong or witholding the truth from us.” And that just couldn’t be further from the truth.
Here is an article from the American Medical Association going into detail on all that he gets wrong in that video.
Testing by Canadian doctor does not prove Covid-19 shots cause clots
A Canadian physician claims in a video clip shared on social media that most people who receive widely-used Covid-19 vaccines will experience blood clots. But experts say his conclusion stems from an analysis that was not published in accordance with scientific method, was not peer-reviewed, and...factcheck.afp.com
This. I cant believe how dumb folks are in regards to this vaccine and biology in general. To try and argue a mask does no good is absolutely ridiculous. Is it going to stop fully aerosolized particles from getting through? probably not, but you have to be a complete idiot or in denial to not realize that a mask would stop the majority of liquid particles from exiting a persons mouth and nostrils if they cough or sneeze. The virus doesn't come out of someone's mouth as a single virus, it catches a ride on much bigger items like moisture and mucous particles that the mask does stop. Its ridiculous that you have to keep explaining this to people.
The government absolutely does not have that right. You might want to brush up on your due process, kidnapping and false imprisonment law, counselor. Your mentality is an endangerment to public health and safety.
Guess again.
supreme.justia.com
You need to go read 361 of the Public Health and Service Act. Your confused with vaccination. They can not enforce vaccination but can enforce quarantine if mandated.
Good luck with this 1905 precedent. When does this "State of Emergency" cease by the way? There was a 99% survival rate for people under the age of 70 -- that's some emergency. Sounds like a typical flu season to me. If you want to be subject to perpetual police power then I say you move Far East, most Americans enjoy freedom.Guess again.
The police power of a State embraces such reasonable regulations relating to matters completely within its territory, and not affecting the people of other States, established directly by legislative enactment, as will protect the public health and safety.
While a local regulation, even if based on the acknowledged police power of a State, must always yield in case of conflict with the exercise by the General Government of any power it possesses under the Constitution, the mode or manner of exercising its police power is wholly within the discretion of the State so long as the Constitution of the United States is not contravened, or any right granted or secured thereby is not infringed, or not exercised in such an arbitrary and oppressive manner as to justify the interference of the courts to prevent wrong and oppression.
The liberty secured by the Constitution of the United States does not import an absolute right in each person to be at all times, and in all circumstances, wholly freed from restraint, nor is it an element in such liberty that one person, or a minority of persons residing in any community and enjoying the benefits of its local government, should have power to dominate the majority when supported in their action by the authority of the State.
It is within the police power of a State to enact a compulsory vaccination law, and it is for the legislature, and not for the courts, to determine
Page 197 U. S. 12
in the first instance whether vaccination is or is not the best mode for the prevention of smallpox and the protection of the public health.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)
Jacobson v. Massachusetts: A state may enact a compulsory vaccination law, since the legislature has the discretion to decide whether vaccination is the best way to prevent smallpox and protect public health. The legislature may exempt children from the law without violating the equal protection...
You are fully vaccinated, yes?
Well we’re running out of hospital beds. So what is your answer beyond let the old die? Cull the herd! Humans are livestock? Not in my country!
Good law - guess we would have to see about that. If that's good law, this country is in bigger trouble than I thought.
How many of those hospital beds are full of people that have been vaccinated or are there for underlying serious medical conditions? Running out of hospital beds -- I drive by a hospital every day that is nearly empty.
So exactly how unsafe is the current shot? Does it raise or lower the mortality rate? Serious question 🤔
90% of students in this country attend public school so pretty much. People willingly vaccine their kids to send them to public school then rage about the idea of not being able to go to the coffee shop without a vaccine. Highly hypocritical imo.
